A.S.VENKATACHALA MOORTHY, K.GNANAPRAKASAM
Jayaraman – Appellant
Versus
Kumaran and others – Respondent
2. In the said suit, his two brothers by name Marappa Reddiar and Kanniappa Reddiar are defendants 1 and 2. Kalangammal, Rajammal and Vedavalli Ammal are defendants 4, 5 and 6 respectively and are the sisters of plaintiff. The third defendant Kullammal is the mother of the plaintiff. Muthappa Reddy is the brother of the third defendant, who is 12th defendant in the suit. Pending proceedings, 3rd, 5th and 12th defendants died and their legal representatives are on record.
3. There are two schedules to plaint ‘A’ and ‘B’. ‘A’ schedule consists of 16 items, while ‘B’ schedule consists of 28 items. Out of the 28 items, items other than 3 to 6 and 20 in ‘B’ schedule are the propertie
Punnayya v. Parandamayya A.I.R. 1927 Mad. 317
In re. A. K. D. Rangaswami Raja and another A.I.R. 1957 Mad. 582 : [1957] 1 M.L.J. 364
The Employees State Insurance Corporation, Madras v. M/s. Shanmugha Theatres
Prakash Chand v. Hindustan Steel A.I.R. 1971 S.C. 2319
Ashwinkumar K. Patel v. Upendra J. Patel A.I.R. 1999 S.C. 1125
Shah Babulal Khimji v. Jayaben D. Kania A.I.R. 1981 S.C. 1786
Somasundaram v. Thangaraju [1997] 1 L.W. 506 : [1997] 2 M.L.J. 228
Tarapore & Co. , Madras v. Tractors Export
Ram Prakash v. Charan Kaur [1997] 9 S.C.C. 543
P. Purushottam Reddy v. M/s. Pratap Steels Limited A.I.R. 2002 S.C. 771
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.