JUDGMENT: Should the 1928 will of the testator who died in the year 1929 be construed in the light of the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and whether the testator intended that the ultimate bequest should go to the heirs of his son both male and female are the questions to be decided here.

2. One Subramania Pillai executed a Will Ex.A-2 dated 22.05.1928. The recitals of the Will will be extracted later. Broadly the intention of the testator appears to have been to protect the properties from being dissipated by his son Manickam who according to the testator was weak and liable to be taken advantage of by others. Therefore, he gave his son a life interest in the property without powers of alienation with the absolute interest to be taken by the heirs of his son. There are other clauses which deal with what should happen if the son Manickam died issueless. On 1.7.1963 under Ex.A-4 Manickam executed a settlement deed in respect of the properties bequeathed under the Will in favour of various persons. Manickam had two wives.

3. In 1976, Ex.A-5 notice was issued by the 1st respondent, one of Manickam’s daughters to her father and the children born to Manickam out of the two

Click Here to Read the rest of this document