1. C.R.P.Nos. 64 to 68 are directed against the order passed in I.A.Nos. 130 to 134 of 1987 in M.C.O.P.Nos.26 to 30 of 1987. Respondents 1 to 8 herein are the petitioners in the main M.C.O.P. Nos.26 to 30 of 1987, filed for compensation. Respondents 11 and 12 are the proposed parties. 10th respondent is the Insurance Company. Petitioner in the said I.As. is one Dr.N.Marichamy, who is the 2nd respondent in the main H.C.O.Ps. Respondents 1 to 8 are the petitioners in the main M.C.O.P.s who claimed a compensation of Rs. 1,00,000 against the 2nd respondent in the M.C.O.Ps. on account of the death caused to one Krishnamurthy Gounder in a motor vehicle accident. In the said main petition for compensation petitioners have alleged that Dr.N. Marichamy was the owner of the vehicle involved in the accident. Marichamy contested the claim and filed a detailed counter-affidavit. According to him, he sold the vehicle in question on 18. 1985 for a cash consideration of Rs. 47,500 to one Muthusamy, who took delivery of the said vehicle on 18. 1985 itself. The records relating to the said vehicle were also handed over to him. Muthusamy has also executed necessary documents in favour of Dr