K.SAMPATH
M. M. Nagalinga Nadar – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmi Family Trust – Respondent
1. The tenant is the revision petitioner. It is a partnership concern. The respondent trust represented by its trustees filed R.C.O.P. No. 149 of 1988 before the Rent Controller, Coimbatore, for the eviction of the revision petitioner under Sec. 14 (1) (b) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (Act 18 of 1960 as amended by Act 23 of 1973) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for demolition and reconstruction.
2. The case as set out in the petition was as follows:
The petition mentioned property belonged to the respondent trust. The revision petitioner was a tenant on a monthly rent of Rs.850. The building was more than 100 years old and in a dilapidated condition. The roofing had become bad and it would collapse at any time. The neighbours had also complained about it. The Municipal Corporation had also raised serious objections to the condition of the building as it had posed a danger to the neighbours and it might fall at any time. Since the purchase of the pr operty in 1981 the respondent trust had been pressing the revision petitioner to vacate the property. On the bona fide impression that the Act would not apply, the respondent trust filed a civi
1997 (1) L.W 218 (7) AIR 1960 SC 100 (9
1989 (2) MLJ 254 (7,40) AIR 1935 Rang 84 (7
2000 (2) CTC 600 (7) AIR 1975 SC 2159 (37)
1998 (1) L.W 616 (7,43) 1967 (80) L.W 54 (12
1997 (1) L.W 527 (7,41) AIR 1966 Pat. 371 (9
1994 (2) ALT 535 (9,19) AIR 1952 All. 825 (7
AIR 1989 Noc. 166 (Cal) (7,20) AIR 1933 Mad. 628 (7
AIR 1986 Cal. 118 (7) AIR 1931 PC 196 (7
AIR 1982 SC 989 (7, 12) ILR 39 Mad. 115 (19
2000 (1) CTC 634 (45) 1970 (77) ITR 637 (7
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.