1. C.R..P. Nos.978 and 979 of 1994 have been filed by the landlady, and the other two Revisions are by the tenants.

2. The landlady is the owner of a lodging house which she purchased in 1978. It originally belonged to one Ganesan, and because he was not getting good income from the property, he sold the same to the landlady in this case.

3. There are about 24 rooms in the building which are used for lodging purpose, and in the downstairs, there are some shoproems. The landlady filed eviction petitions against various tenants under Sec.14(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, i. e., for demolition and reconstruction, and also for the purpose of additional accommodation.

4. Originally the Rent Controller dismissed the eviction petition. When the matter was taken before the appellate authority, it allowed the appeal on bom the grounds.

5. The matter was taken to this Court by one of the tenants. The same was not admitted, and the aggrieved tenant filed a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court. It was contended before the Supreme Court that the appellate authority got confused itself regarding the grounds under Sec.l4(l)(b) of the Act and S