High Court of Judicature at Madras
SRINIVASAN & THANGAMANI
Parambikulam Aliyar Project Original Ayacutdars Association rep. by its Secretary, K.S. Balachandran & Others
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Secretary to Government & Others
Writ Petition Nos. 12581 & 19922 of 1993 & 2158 of 1994
Decided On :Decided on: 15-07-1994
The impugned Act is constitutionally valid and the petitioners' contention that the Act is ultra vires the powers of the Legislature, violative of Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution, and vitiated by malafides is rejected. The principle of estoppel is not available against the Legislature.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, registered ayacutdars under the Parambikulam-Aliyar Project, challenged the validity of the Act 20 of 1993, which regulated the supply of water from the project. They argued that the Act was ultra vires the powers of the Legislature, violative of Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution, and vitiated by malafides.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the Act was constitutionally valid and the petitioners' contentions were rejected. The court found that the Act was a measure of agrarian reform to bring more lands under cultivation and increase agricultural production, and that it did not violate the petitioners' fundamental rights. The court also held that the principle of estoppel was not available against the Legislature.
Issues: 1. Whether the Act 20 of 1993 is ultra vires the powers of the Legislature? 2. Whether the Act violates Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution? 3. Whether the Act is vitiated by malafides? 4. Whether the principle of estoppel is available against the Legislature?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Act is not ultra vires the powers of the Legislature because: - The State Legislature is competent to enact a law on the subjects mentioned in List II of the Seventh Schedule. - The Act falls under Entries 14 and 17, which deal with agriculture and water, respectively. - There is no repugnancy between the State Act and the Central Act. - The doctrine of separation of powers is not applicable in India. - A legislation can affect or take away vested rights subject to the limitations prescribed by the Constitution. - The petitioners had no vested right to get the benefit of accustomed user of water. 2. The Act does not violate Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution because: - The Act is not arbitrary or unreasonable. - The Act is a measure of agrarian reform to bring more lands under cultivation and increase agricultural production. - The Act does not impose an unreasonable restriction on the petitioners' fundamental rights. - The Act does not deprive the petitioners of their livelihood. 3. The Act is not vitiated by malafides because: - There is no evidence that the Act was passed with a view to win the bye-election for Palani Parliamentary constituency. - Even if the motive of the government was to secure more votes in the election, that motive cannot render the passing of the law mala fide. 4. The principle of estoppel is not available against the Legislature because: - The Legislature can never be precluded from exercising its legislative function by resort to the doctrine of promissory estoppel. - The Government or public authority cannot be debarred by promissory estoppel from enforcing a statutory prohibition.
Final Decision: The writ petitions were dismissed. The petitioners in W.P. Nos. 19922 of 1993 and 2158 of 1994 were ordered to pay the costs of the respective respondents.
SRINIVASAN, J.
I. HISTORY.
1. The Parambikulam Aliyar Project was conceived in 1959 for the purpose of exploiting the rivers in the Western Ghats in Anamalai Region to the fullest extent possible and giving irrigation facilities to as much area as possible in the rain shadow lands which are always drought-stricken for nearly two centuries. The Project depended on the combined effort and co-operation of two neighboring States-Tamil Nadu and Kerala-for harnessing the rivers flowing in both the States. It contemplated integration of eight rivers, six on Anamalai Hills viz., Anamalayar, Nirar, Sholayar, Parambikulam, Thunakadavu and Peruvaripallam and two on the plains viz., Aliyar and Palar, by constructing reservoirs across them and inter-connecting them by tunnels, the tunnels were to help diversion of the waters impounded in the reservoirs to the plains of the then Coimbatore district in Tamil Nadu and Chithur district in Kerala State. As the rivers were in various elevations ranging between 3800 feet and 1050 feet, it was incidentally possible to utilise the drops between the rivers for the development of hydro-power. The project envisaged construction of dams and power houses. The Taluks of Palladam, Udamalpet, Pollachi and Dharapuram in the then coimbatore District formed a very dry region chronically famine-stricken with poor rain fall and no natural water resources. During the last century and the first half of this century, the Government had to spend large sums of money to afford relief to the famine stricken people in the area besides large remissions given to them.
Dharapuram Taluk became part of Periyar District after the bifurcation of Coimbatore District. With a view to develop the entire area and raise the general standard of living, the project mentioned above was undertaken. Canals had to be constructed in such a manner as to make use of each and every drop of water to the fullest extent possible and without wasting any part of it. It was initially estimated that 30.5 TMC feet of water could be realised and utilised for irrigation, out of which 2.5 TMC feet in the Anamalayar Project would be available for Tamil Nadu only after the State of Kerala completes the Edamalayar Scheme.
2. The project is divided into two basins viz., Aliyar Basin and Plar Basin. It should be mentioned that an area of about 40.000 acres was expected to be irrigated by Aliyar basin every year and since 1973-1974 that region has been getting water once in two years.
3. With reference to Palar basin, it was originally estimated that an extent of 2.03 lakhs acres of land could be irrigated. The work on the project commenced in 1960. It was decided that even before the completion of the entire project, the available water could be released for the purpose of irrigation of such extent as may be possible. Government framed rules known as Parambikulam Aliyar Project Water Cess Rules, 1965 in G.O.Ms. No. 1956, Public Works, dated 26-6-1965, in exercise of the powers conferred by S. 1 of the Madras Irrigation Cess Act, 1865 for the levy of water cess for the irrigation of the lands under the project. Rule 3 provides for issue of permits for all the lands irrigation of which is allowed from the project by or under the orders of the State Government. A form of permit is also prescribed, which contains the conditions under which the same is issued. A fee is charged for the issue of permit. Rule 5 enables the District Collector or the Executive Engineer concerned to cancel or modify any permit at any time after giving an opportunity to the permit-holder to put forward his objection. The rates of water cess are fixed by the Rules. Conditions 5 to 10 of the Conditions set out in the prescribed form read as follows.
“5) The permit holder shall not take water contrary to any turn system that may be introduced by the authorities.
6) Irrigation of the land at any time, other than the period mentioned in column (9) or through any source other than that
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.