CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, K.B.K.VASUKI
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Bharti Airtel Ltd, Rep. by its Legal Manager – Respondent
Common Judgment
Chitra Venkataraman, J.
1. The above Writ appeals are preferred by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India against the order passed by this Court, extending the order of interim stay originally granted by this Court in favour of the respondents herein.
2. It is seen from the order passed by this Court, which is now under challenge, that an order of interim stay was originally granted by this Court while ordering notice regarding admission returnable in two weeks. W.P.No.1875 of 2013, which relates to Writ Appeal No.855 of 2013, came up for admission before the learned single Judge on 24.01.2013, where notice regarding admission was ordered, directing the petitioner to send private notice to the respondent. This Court recorded the submission of the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner in W.P.No.1875 of 2013, that in the event of any amount payable by the petitioner, the petitioner was willing to make the payment. Recording the said undertaking, this Court granted an order of interim stay as prayed for. Subsequently, W.P.No.3652 of 2013 was filed, which is the subject matter of appeal in W.A.No.854 of 2013. Considering the identical issues
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.