SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Mad) 2334

G.RAJASURIA
P. Mani – Appellant
Versus
M. Sangeetha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:S. Baskaran, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :-

1. This Second appeal is focussed by the defendant animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 3.10.2012 passed by the Principal Subordinate Judge, Thiruvannamalai, in confirming the judgment and decree dated 26.11.2010 passed by the Principal District Munsif, Thiruvannamalai, in O.S.No.429 of 2008, which was one for partition.

2. The parties are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court. 3.Compendiously and concisely the germane facts absolutely necessary for the disposal of this Second Appeal, would run thus:

(a) The respondents herein, as plaintiffs, filed the suit seeking partition of the twelve items of the suit properties found described in the schedule of the plaint by averring that the plaintiffs, namely, Sangeetha(P1) and minor Deepa(P2)-represented by her mother Angammal, are the daughters of the defendant-Mani. The defendant is in possession and enjoyment of those suit properties which are the ancestral properties, and that they are entitled to their aliquot shares, so to say, 1/3rd share each, totally 2/3rd share in the plaint scheduled properties.

(b) W hereas the defendant filed the written statement



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top