V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
D. Narayanasamy – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Tiruvarur – Respondent
1. The petitioner is the father of a minor boy by name N. Jayaprakesh. When the petitioner's son was studying 12th Standard during the academic year 2008-2009, in the Government Higher Secondary School, Pulivalam, Tiruvarur District, he was taken by the N.S.S. Programmer of his school to a camp organised by N.S.S., at a village by name Perungudi. The camp was scheduled to be held for a period of 10 days from 17.12.2008 till 26.12.2008.
2. Unfortunately, the petitioner's son was seriously injured, when a pumping machine installed by the Oil Natural and Gas Commission, which is the fourth respondent herein, exploded. The petitioner's son was first treated at a local hospital and was later shifted to a private hospital at Thanjavur. On the recommendation of the District Collector, the Oil Natural and Gas Commission released a sum of Rs.50,000/- for the treatment of the petitioner's son at the private hospital. But, the private hospital demanded a huge amount for continuing the treatment. At that stage, the petitioner came up with the above writ petition, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents jointly to pay a sum of Rs.10 lakhs as compensation. Pe
Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Uphaar Tragedy Victims Association {2011 (14) SCC 481}
Sudhir Kumar Rana vs. Surinder Singh {2008 ACJ 1834}
K. Samikkannu vs. Union of India {1997 (1) LW 439}
Gough vs. Thorne {1966 (3) All.E.R. 398}
Gobald Motor Service Ltd vs. R.M.K. Veluswami {AIR 1962 SC 1}
C.K. Subramania Iyer vs. T. Kunhikuttan Nair {1969 (3) SCC 64}
Organo Chemical Industries vs. Union of India {1979 (4) SCC 573}
In M.S.Grewal vs. Deep Chand Sood {2001 (8) SCC 151}
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.