M. Duraiswamy, J.

1. The above Appeals arise against the common judgment passed in A.S. No. 58 of 2010 and A.S. No. 1 of 2011 on the file of the Principal Sub-Court, Tindivanam.

2. S.A. No. 1192 of 2012 arises against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S. No. 58 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Sub-Court, Tindivanam, modifying the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S. No. 229 of 2004 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Tindivanam.

3. S.A. No. 1193 of 2012 arises against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S. No. 1 of 2011 on the file of the Principal Sub-Court, Tindivanam modifying the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S. No. 229 of 2004 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Tindivanam.

4. The Plaintiff is the Appellant and the Respondents were the Defendants 1, 3, 5 to 7 in the Suit. The Second Defendant died during the pendency of the Suit. The Plaintiff filed the Suit in O.S. No. 229 of 2004 for declaration, delivery of possession, mandatory injunction, past and future profits for illegal use and occupation and for other reliefs.

5. The brief case of the Plaintiff is as follows:-

(i) According to the Plaintiff, the Suit property orig