S. Vimala, J.

1. A defaulting tenant, who was ordered to pay a sum of Rs. 837/- towards arrears of rent on or before 14.10.1977, having committed a default again, and having suffered an order of eviction on 25.01.1978, whether can be allowed to prolong the case without vacating the premises (including the legal representatives also) till 2016, i.e. nearly for 40 years? Is it not the right time to revamp the judicial system, to reform the procedure and redraft the related laws, is the critical issue that would arise in the mind of the Court as well as the litigants.

1.1.When getting delivery of possession from the tenant is more onerous, than the delivery of a child from a mother and when the execution of the decree for the possession is achieved by the landlord; When such delivery recorded is branded as a paper delivery and not an actual delivery; when the tenant is guilty of recurring infringement of the order of the Court; when the decree holder do not claim any right independent of the right of his vendor/earlier decree holder; and when the subsequent purchaser has