SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 2598

M.DURAISWAMY
G. V. Vanitha – Appellant
Versus
K. Dhanasekaran – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. V. Raghavachari.
For the Respondent: Mr. S. Subbiah.

ORDER :

1. The Civil Revision Petition arises against the judgment and decree passed in R.C.A. No. 40/2012, on the file of Rent Control Appellate Authority, Subordinate Court, Tambaram, reversing the fair and final order passed in an unnumbered E.A.S.R. No. 9486/2012 in E.P. No. 36/2002 on the file of the Rent Controller cum District Munsif Court, Alandur. The petitioners are the landlords/decree holders and the respondents are third parties, who filed an application under Order 21 Rules 96 to 100 of Civil Procedure Code.

2. The respondents filed an unnumbered application in E.A.S.R. No. 9486/2012 in E.P. No. 36/2002 in R.C.O.P. No. 30/1997, stating that they are in occupation of a property bearing T.S. No. 43, Old S. No. 12 part in Ward H, Block-10, to an extent of 380 sq. meters (approximately 4200 sq.ft.,) bearing Door No. 19, Jal Naicker Street, Alandur, Chennai 16. The respondents contended that they are the owners of the said property and that they have been living with their respective families in the property by putting up separate constructions and they have also pleaded that they were not aware of the decree passed in R.C.O.P No. 30/1997 and the execution proceedings, pendi





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top