G.JAYACHANDRAN
Chiranjeevi Rathnam – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh – Respondent
The legal issue for decision before this Court is, whether a civil suit to declare the appointment/co-option of some of the defendants/Directors of a Private Limited Company as illegal and void; to grant permanent injunction restraining them from any manner functioning as Directors of that company; further injunction restraining the said company from conducting any Extraordinary General Body Meeting/Annual General Body is maintainable in a civil court, in the light of Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013?
2. M/s Standard Fireworks Private Limited, which is the epicentre of the dispute, is a Private Limited Company controlled by three families namely, Yennarkay Ravindran Family (34% shares), Arunachalam Nadar of Pioneer Group (33% shares) and Chelladurai Nadar of Bell Group (33% shares). The 34% shares in M/s Standard Fireworks Private Limited Company held by Yennarkay Ravindran family are with three companies run by that family. Those three companies are M/s Rajarathnam Matches Private Limited, M/s Chiranjeevi Rathnam Matches Private Limited and M/s Selvarathnam Matches Private Limited. Each of these three companies hold 11.09% of share in M/s Standard Fireworks Private Lim
Dhulabhai v. State of Madhya Pradesh
K.S. Venkataraman & Co., v. State of Madras
Nahar Industrial Enterprises Ltd vs. Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation
Robust Hotels Private Limited and others vs. Eih Limited and others
Swamy Atmananda and others vs. Sri Ramakrishna Tapovanam and others
The premier Automobiles Ltd. v. Kamlakar Shantaram
T. Arivandandam v. V. Satyapal and another reported in AIR 1977 SC 2421
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.