S. Vaidyanathan, J.

1. This Review Application filed for reviewing the judgment dated 26.10.2016 in Writ Appeal No.715 of 2015 on the file of this Court.

2. The Memorandum of Grounds of Review Application proceeds only on two aspects, namely (i) the written submissions/arguments have not been considered and that it contained the authorities in support of the contentions of the review petitioners, and (ii) the Khulanama dated 09.06.2006 is a forged one and by virtue of the Certificate issued by the second respondent, dated 27.06.2006, the review petitioners/writ appellants were deprived of their rights and that the Chief Kazi has dissolved the marriage, thereby permitting the third respondent, namely T.C.A.Mohamed Yusuf to marry another Muslim woman.

3. We have rendered categorical findings in the said Writ Appeal, and the relevant portion of the judgment dated 26.10.2016 passed in W.A.No.715 of 2015 reads as follows:

"13. For the very allegations made by the appellants/writ petitioners, criminal proceedings have already been initiated and the same are pending before the Criminal Court. The veracity or otherwise of the allegations can be gone into by the Criminal Court after f