M.SATHYANARAYANAN
MEHARAJ – Appellant
Versus
HURMATHUTH NISHA – Respondent
M. SATHYANARAYANAN, J.
1. The plaintiff in OS.No.47/2012 on the file of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Sathyamangalam, is the appellant herein.
2. The appellant/plaintiff filed the said suit praying for the relief of partition of the suit property along with the land and superstructure bearing new Door No.343, Kotuveerampalayam Village, Sathyamangalam Bazaar, Sathyamangalam, into three equal shares and to allot one such share to the plaintiff, declaring the alleged forged document of a Sale Deed bearing Document No.982/1973 dated 18.05.1973 as null and void and also to award cost.
3. The 3rd defendant has filed the written statement refuting the allegations and she also filed IA.No.342 of 2012 under Order 7, Rule 11(a)(b) and under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for rejection of the plaint and the said application, after contest, came to be ordered vide judgment and decree 31.08.2015. The plaintiff aggrieved by the judgment and decree, rejecting the plaint, filed an appeal in AS.No.13 of 2016 on the file of the Court of III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gopichettipalayam, and the Lower Appellate Court, vide judgment and decree dated 28.02.2017,
N. Ravindran v. V. Ramachandran
Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra
I.T.C. Ltd. v. Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
T. Arivandandam v. T.V. Satyapal
Roop Lal Sathi v. Nachhattar Singh Gill
Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd. v. Ganesh Property
Popat Kotecha Property v. State Bank of India Staff Association 2005 (7) SCC 510
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.