IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
Sheik Dawood Al Mothi – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Kancheepuram – Respondent
Crl. A. No. 756 of 2008
Decided On : 09-07-2018
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 324, 390, 394, 397 and 379 - Criminal procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 102, 313, 54A and 162 - Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9 and 8 – Attack from Iron Rod - Who is running a travel agency by name geo travels requested pw-2 who was owner of car bearing registration to send car for a passenger who wants to travel - Accordingly pw-2 asked his driver to take car and pick up passenger - Pw-1 took car and when he was proceeding near magestic circle accused waved his hands pw-1 stopped car and accused after confirming name of car driver told pw-1 that he was passenger who wanted to go to chennai - Accused boarded car and sat in rear seat when car was proceeding towards chennai en-route pw-1 and accused got down and had dinner - Thereafter car further proceeded and came to a halt accused wanted to answer call of nature - After car came to a halt accused took an iron rod from car and hit pw-1 in his head repeatedly as a result of which pw-1 fell on side and accused took away in car pw-1 thereafter managed to stop a lorry and got into it and informed driver of lorry about incident - Held, Police in order to assure themselves that accused person who has been arrested is person who has actually committed offence must seek for a direction from court having jurisdiction to conduct a test identification parade - Specifically empowers court to direct holding of an identification of accused person at request of prosecution - By following this procedure in cases of this nature there is at least an assurance for investigating agency that investigation is going on in right direction - That apart such an identification will become relevant and it can be used in criminal proceedings as evidence - Of course cctv footage has now become a very important tool for police which helps them in a long way in crime detection but this is a facility which is not available in all nook and corner of state - Police personnel needs to be educated on availability of a provision for identifying accused person - By following this procedure element of doubt that arises about identity of accused for first time in court after a very long gap can also be avoided - Appeal is allowed.
1. This appeal has been filed aggrieved by the order of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Court cum F.T.C. No. II, Kancheepuram in S.C. No. 22 of 2007, dated 24.09.2008.
The case of the prosecution in brief:
2. PW-7, who is running a Travel Agency by name Geo Travels at Bangalore, requested PW-2 who was the owner of the Qualis Car bearing registration No. KA-03-MA-7449 on 04.03.2004, to send the Car for a passenger who wants to travel from Bangalore to Chennai. Accordingly PW-2 asked his driver Ravindrathan (PW-1) to take the Car and pick up the passenger. (PW-1) Ravindrathan took the Car and at about 5.30 p.m. when he was proceeding near Magestic Anandha Circle, Bangalore, the accused waved his hands and Ravindrathan (PW-1) stopped the Car and accused after confirming the name of the Car driver, told Ravindrathan (PW-1) that he was the passenger who wanted to go to Chennai. The accused boarded the Car and sat in the rear seat. When the Car was proceeding towards Chennai, en-route, Ravindrathan (PW-1) and the accused got down at Krishnagiri and had dinner. Thereafter, the Car further proceeded and came to a halt at 1.00 a.m. on 05.03.2004, since the accused wanted to answer the call of nature. After the car came to a halt, the accused took a Iron Jocky Rod (M.O-2) from the Car and hit Ravindrathan (PW-1) in his head repeatedly as a result of which Ravindrathan (PW-1) fell on the side and the accused took away in the Car. Ravindrathan (PW-1) thereafter managed to stop a lorry and got into it and informed the driver of the lorry about the incident. When the lorry approached a Highway Patrol Police, Ravindrathan (PW-1) got down from the lorry and informed (PW-12) who was the Inspector on patrol duty about the incident. Immediately, the Police arranged for an ambulance and on its arrival the ambulance compounder (PW-5) gave first aid treatment and Ravindrathan (PW-1) was brought to the Government Hospital at Walajahpet, where he was given treatment by PW-16.
3. Thereafter PW-2, the owner of the Car came to Walajapet Hospital and visited Ravindrathan (PW-1). On the basis of the statement given by Ravindrathan (PW-1) in the Hospital, the same was reduced into a complaint (Ex.P-1) by PW-17 who is the Inspector of Police of Kaveripakkam Police Station. Since the place of occurrence fell within the jurisdiction of Baluchetty Chathiram Police Station, (Ex.P-1) Complaint was sent to the concerned Police Station and an FIR was registered in Crime No. 174 of 2004 (Ex.P-16) for an offence under Section 324 and 379 IPC. The Inspector of Police took up the case for investigation and visited the scene of occurrence and prepared Observation Mahazar (Ex.P-17) and Rough Sketch (Ex.P-18) in the presence of witnesses PW-3 & PW-4. Thereafter, the statement of witnesses was recorded and Alteration Report (Ex.P-19) sent to the Magistrate Court altering the offence to Section 392 IPC. Thereafter, the investigation was taken over by Ramamoorthy, Inspector of Police.
4. In the meantime on 23.05.2005, (PW-10) who is the Sub Inspector, Central Crime Branch, Hyderabad Special Team, received an information that a Merun Colour Qualis Car was found abandoned near Cholichowky, Hyderabad City. He went to the spot and brought the abandoned vehicle to the Police Station and submitted a report to the Deputy Commissioner of Police who in turn forwarded the report to the Sub Inspector (PW-9) and based on the report PW-9, registered a case in Crime No. 387/2005 under Section 102 of Criminal procedure Code. (Ex.P-4) is the printed copy of the First Information Report. (PW-11) Inspector of Police took over investigation in this case and formally seized the Car under (Ex.P-5) Seizure Report. (PW-15) Inspector of Police, succeeded PW-11 and took up further investigation. In the course of investigation, the accused person was arrested at Humayun Nagar on 26.08.2006, at about 10.30 a.m. under suspicious circumstances. The accused is said to hav
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.