SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Mad) 3399

S.MANIKUMAR, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
G. Kanagasabai – Appellant
Versus
Secretary, Department of Higher Education – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Chellamuthu, C. Munusamy, E. Manoharan.

JUDGMENT

1. Public Interest Writ Petition has been filed challenging the action of the respondents 1 to 6, pertaining to the appointment of respondents 7 and 8 and consequently prayed for a direction to the 2nd respondent to conduct an enquiry in respect of the certificate of Experience produced by respondents 7 and 8 and take further action.

2. Case of the petitioner is that Dr. N. Rajendran, Son of Narayanasamy, 7th respondent herein, residing at Door No. 1-4, New Kothangudi Flats, Aranganathan Salai, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram 608 002, who is now posted as Assistant Professor, Department of Zoology, Government Arts and College, Chidambaram, has obtained employment, misleading the authorities, regarding his qualification. Under RTI, the petitioner came to know that Dr. N. Rajendran (7th respondent) never served as a Teacher at Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Annamalai University, but served only as a Research Officer and that his appointment was not under the employment of University.

3. The petitioner has further submitted that the 7th respondent applied for the p































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top