N.ANAND VENKATESH
S. Nandhini – Appellant
Versus
State Inspector of Police – Respondent
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the FIR in Crime No.2 of 2015, pending on the file of the respondent Police. The petitioner has been shown as A-2 in the FIR.
2. The case of the prosecution is that one Mayakrishnan had remitted a total sum of Rs.1,75,000/- to the Financial Establishment run by A-1 to A-4 in a name and style of Jalagandeswarar Auto Finance. The said Mayakrishnan came to know that the accused persons have collected various amounts from different depositors and have defaulted in repaying the deposits even after maturity. Therefore, he insisted the repayment of the amount remitted by him. Since it was not repaid, he gave a complaint to the respondent Police and the respondent Police have registered an FIR against four accused persons for an offence under Section 120 b, 406, 420 IPC and Section 5 of the TNPID Act. [TNPID Act "hereinafter referred as 'the Act"]
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner primarily submitted that Section 5 of the Act will not be attracted in this case since even as per the complainant, the amount was paid by him towards a chit transaction. The learned counsel submitted that the amount remitted in a chit t
CIT v. Bazpur Coop. Sugar Factory Ltd.
Greater Bombay Cooperative Bank & Ors. Vs. United Yarn Tex (P) Ltd. & Ors.
K.K. Baskaran vs. State of Tamil Nadu
KSL & Industries Ltd. v. Arihant Threads Ltd.
Margadarshi Chit Funds (P) Ltd.
New Horizon Sugar Mills Limited v. Government of Pondicherry
P.N. Raghavan Pattar v. S. Arumugham
Soma Suresh Kumar .Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Soma Suresh Kumar vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.