M.S.RAMESH
N. Mohan – Appellant
Versus
P. Govindasami – Respondent
1. The order under challenge in the present Civil Revision Petition is rejection of the petitioner's application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, to reject the plaint in O.S.No.503 of 2016 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Alandur, filed under Order 7 Rule 1 r/w. Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
2. Heard Mr.V.Raghavachari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.G.Ilamurugu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2.
3. The petitioner herein is the first defendant in the suit filed by the respondents 1 and 2 herein, seeking for the reliefs of declaration to declare the Sale Deed dated 16.11.1998 executed in favour of the first defendant as null and void and consequently, declare the plaintiffs/respondents herein as absolute owners of the suit property. The plaintiffs had also sought for the relief of mandatory injunction, to remove the alleged encroachment; to demolish the existing structure in the suit property; and to deliver vacant possession and also for consequential permanent injunction.
4. The petitioner herein had filed the application under Order 7 Rule 11 to reject the plaint predominantl
Cambridge Solutions Limited, Bangalore-560 095 V. Global Software Ltd., Chennai-18 and others
D.Ramachandran V. R.V. Janakiraman and others
Dr.Ravichander V. Karunakaran and others
Hardesh Ores (P) Ltd V. Head and Company
Madanuri Sri Rama Chandra Murthy V. Syed Jalal
Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. and Others Vs. Owners & Parties, Vessel M.V. Fortune Express and Others
Roop Lal Sathi Versus Nachhattar Singh Gill (1982) 3 S.C.C. 487
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.