Back
A.P.SAHI, SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
Ravisam – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Housing & Urban Development Department, Chennai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. land acquisition dispute based on ownership (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. notification process and objections raised (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. interim injunction during acquisition proceedings (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. court's observation on failure to consider material facts (Para 24 , 49) |
| 5. arguments against acquisition validity (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. ruling to restore writ petition for re-evaluation (Para 85) |
JUDGMENT :
A.P. Sahi, J.
(Prayer: Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 24.6.2019 in W.P.No.3640 of 2001.)
1. The present appeal arises out of the judgment dated 24.6.2019 of the learned Single Judge delivering a common judgment in two writ petitions, one of which W.P.No.3640 of 2001 was filed by the appellant challenging the acquisition proceedings under the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1894 (for brevity, “the 1894 Act”) with a prayer to quash notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the said Act, whereby land measuring 3.03 Acres of SF.Nos.411/1 and 411/2 in Vilankurichi Village, Coimbatore North Taluk, has been acquired. This app
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
