S.VAIDYANATHAN
V. Prabakar – Appellant
Versus
Chennai Port Trust, Rep. by its Chairman, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition challenging the impugned order passed by the Respondent vide Ref.No.CME/A1/1676/2013/MEE, dated 14.06.2014 and the Memorandum of the Respondent vide No.CME/A1/1676/2013/MEE, dated 19.10.2020 with the IO Report dated 14.08.2020, and for a consequential direction to the Respondents to regulate the period of suspension and as well as out of employment period, as duty for all purposes and for a further direction to the Respondents to draw and disburse pay and allowances due to him.
2. Facts leading to the filing of the present Writ Petition, as narrated by the Petitioner in his Affidavit, are thus:
2(a) According to the Petitioner, he joined the services of the Respondent/Port Trust in January 1987. By merit and seniority, he was promoted as Deputy Chief Engineer in the year 2012. Though, he became due for promotion as Chief Engineer, on account of a pending criminal case, he could not claim for the post of Chief Mechanical Engineer, while some of his juniors were already promoted to the said post, to the other Ports.
2(b) As Deputy Chief Mechanical Engineer, the prime responsibility of the Petitioner was to provide power supply to
Ajaykumar Choudhary vs. Union of India
Lav Nigam vs. Chairman & Managing Director
Siemens Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Oryx Fisheries Private Limited vs. Union of India
Suresh Pathrella vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce
Moni Shankar vs. Union of India
Southern Railway Officers Association vs. Union of India
Samar Bahadur Singh vs. State of U.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.