JUDGMENT :

Dr. G. Jayachandran, J.

(The case has been heard through Video Conference)

1. The Second Appeal arises from the Suit for ejectment of the Defendant from the Suit property, delivery of vacant possession after removing the superstructure and for recovery of arrears of rent. The Defendant is the Appellant.

2. The Suit property belongs to M/s. Anandammal Adheena Trust. The Appellant entered into a Lease Agreement with the erstwhile Trustees and in occupation of the Suit land. The lease between the Trustees and the Appellant was renewed on 3.7.1985 for a further period of 17 years. After giving credit to the advance of Rs. 300 received by the Trust under the earlier Lease Agreement, additional advance of Rs. 200 received under the new lease: On Termination of the lease, the Trust agreed to return Rs. 500. The total money received as advance, without interest. The Appellant was permitted to put up structure and carry on business, on condition he should remove the superstructure and hand over the vacant possession on expiry of the lease. The tent was fixed at Rs. 120 p.m., payable on or before 5th of every succeeding month. In event of default in payment of rent, the Trust is entit