SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 16

M. S. RAMESH
R. Murugesan – Appellant
Versus
Home (Police-III) Department, Secretariat, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For The Petitioner: Ms.R.Vijaya Kamala
For the Respondents: Mrs.P.Rajarajeswari, GA

ORDER :

To the claim made by the petitioner herein for retrospective promotion for the post of Naik and Head Constable on par with his junior and also for inclusion of his name in the C-List of Head Constable (AR) fit for promotion to the posts of Sub Inspector of Police, this Court by an order dated 14.09.2010 in W.P.No.22221 of 2009 had passed the following order:-

    “18. Though the impugned order is in accordance with statutory rules, applicable to the post of Sub Inspector of Police, considering the averment made in the writ Petition and the statutory provision, Rule 25(b) of the Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Service Rules, this Court is inclined to direct the respondents to include the name of the petitioner in the list of Police Constable fit for promotion as Naik, as on 26.12.1995 and consequently, as Head Constable as on 09.12.1997, on par with his Junior, Thiru.Lakshmanan. Insofar as the post of Sub Inspector of Police is concerned, the same had been filled up by conducting tests and other eligibility criteria, as per the service rules. Therefore, in view of the petitioner-s inclusion in the list of Naiks as on 26.12.1995 and in the list of Head Constables as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top