SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 897

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M.Subramaniam, J.
H.Barkha – Petitioner
Versus
V.J.Chandira Gupta and ors. – Respondents
CRP Nos.3475, 3477 to 3480 of 2022 and CMP Nos.18520, 18522, 18524 to 18526 of 2022
Decided On : 09-12-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms.Sudarsana Sundar for Mr.Ravi Raja Bappu
For the Respondent: Mr.S.L.Sudarsanam

The Rent Court and Rent Tribunal must ensure speedy disposal of applications under the Act, and parties must comply with court orders to avoid prolonging proceedings.

Headnote:

Tamil Nadu Regulation and Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 - Eviction Proceedings - Section 36 - Summary

Fact of the Case:

The tenants filed civil revision petitions against fair and decretal orders passed in eviction proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Regulation and Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017. They argued that the Trial Court failed to consider the Supreme Court's order on limitation during the Covid-19 pandemic and violated principles of natural justice. The respondents contended that the petitions were filed to prolong the appeal proceedings.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the Rent Court provided opportunities to the tenants, but they failed to comply with the orders and pay the awarded costs. The First Appellate Court was expected to dispose of the appeals expeditiously, and the civil revision petitions were dismissed accordingly.

Issues: Failure to comply with court orders, violation of principles of natural justice, and prolonging appeal proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi: The Rent Court and Rent Tribunal are expected to dispose of applications quickly, avoiding unnecessary delays. Parties must vigilantly avail opportunities provided by the court and comply with orders. The purpose of the Act is to redress grievances promptly and avoid lengthy procedures.

Final Decision: The civil revision petitions were dismissed, and there was no order as to costs.

ORDER :

These Civil Revision Petitions are filed against the common fair and decretal order respectively dated 11.04.2022 and 11.04.2022 passed in MP Nos.3 and 4 of 2021 in MP Nos.2 and 2 of 2021 in RLTOP No.96 of 2020 and to set aside the fair order and decretal order respectively dated 11.04.2022, 11.04.2022 and 13.12.2021 made in MP Nos.4 and 3 of 2021 in MP Nos.2 and 2 of 2021 in RLTOP No.97 of 2020 and to set aside the fair and decretal order passed in MP No.2 of 2021 in RLTOP No.97 of 2020 on the file of the X Small Causes Court at Chennai.

2. The revision petitioners are the tenants and the respondents instituted eviction proceedings under the provisions of the New Act, i.e., Tamil Nadu Regulation and Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 (Tamil Nadu Act No.42 of 2017) [hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’, in short].

3. The Rent Court adjudicated and passed an order on 21.11.2020 in two RLTOP Nos.96 and 97 of 2020 on the file of the X Small Causes Court at Chennai and directed the revision petitioners/tenants to vacate and hand over possession to the respondent-landlord, within a period of one month. Challenging the order passed by the Rent Court, the revision petitioners filed appeals in RLTA Nos.66 and 67 of 2022. The RLTAs were posted for arguments on 07.11.2022 and after hearing the arguments, the appeals were posted for orders on 28.11.2022. At that juncture, the revision petitioners moved these civil revision petitions before this Court and filed a memo and due to the pendency of these civil revision petitions before this Court, the appeals have not been disposed of.

4. The revision petitioners filed miscellaneous petitions before the First Appellate Court to set aside the orders passed in RLTOP by the Rent Court. The said miscellaneous petitions were adjudicated and the set aside petitions were allowed on condition to pay the cost. However, the cost amount awarded by the Rent Court was not paid by the revision petitioners and consequently, the miscellaneous petitions were dismissed.

5. The revision petitioners filed the appeals before the First Appellate Court in RLTA Nos.66 and 67 of 2022. The said appeals were progressed and during the final stage of the appeal proceedings, the present Civil Revision Petitions are filed before this Court on 17.10.2022.

6. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the revision petitioner mainly contended that the Trial Court failed to take note of the order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India dispensing with the period of limitation during the Covid 19 pandemic period and therefore, the Trial Court ought not to have dismissed the miscellaneous petitions merely on the ground that the revision petitioners had not paid the cost. It is further contended that the appeals were filed and the order being grossly in violation of the principles of natural justice and the revision petitioners denied reasonable opportunity to defend their case before the Trial Court. These civil revision petitions are filed for the purpose of defending the case before the Trial Court. Thus the revision petitions now filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India are to be considered.

7. The learned counsel for the respondents objected the contentions raised on behalf of the revision petitioners by stating that once the appeal is preferred against the orders passed by the Rent Court, the civil revision petitions now filed are to prolong and protract the appeal proceedings and therefore, the civil revision petitions are to be rejected.

8. The learned counsel for the petitioners reiterated that the respondents have deprived of their monthly rent from June 2022 onwards and the arrears of rent is yet to be settled by the revision petitioners. That apart, the learned counsel for the respondent furnished the copy of the E-Court proceedings to establish that the RLTA proceedings are posted for arguments on 26.09.2022 and on 07.11.2022 and thereafter, it is listed for passing orders

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top