Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
Pushpavalli Suresh Babhu – Appellant
Versus
Sopos Technologies Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
PRAYER : This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 19.09.2022 in MP No.7 of 2022 in RLTOP No.510 of 2020 on the file of the XVI Court of Small Causes at Chennai.
The present Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 19.09.2022 passed in MP No.7 of 2022 in RLTOP No.510 of 2020 on the file of the XVI Court of Small Causes at Chennai.
2. The revision petitioner is the landlady instituted eviction proceedings under TN Act 42 of 2017 and the respondent-Company-tenant defended their case. The eviction was ordered by the Rent Court.
3. During the pendency of the eviction application, the revision petitioner-landlady filed MP No.7 of 2020 for recovery of rent under Section 25 of the New Act. The said application was adjudicated and dismissed by the Rent Court along with the order passed in the RLTOP proceedings.
4. The grievance of the revision petitioner is that once a miscellaneous petition is filed, claiming arrears of rent under Section 25 of the New Act, it is to be decided by the Rent Court before the disposal of the RLTOP proceedings.
5. In the present case, the miscellaneous petition was dispose
High Court under Article 227 directs expeditious disposal of rent eviction case due to tenant's rent arrears and non-filing of counter.
The Rent Court and Rent Tribunal must ensure speedy disposal of applications under the Act, and parties must comply with court orders to avoid prolonging proceedings.
Unregistered tenancy agreement ineffective if prior registered agreement exists; revision petition dismissed upholding lower court order.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
