SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 915

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.Raja, D.Krishnakumar, JJ.
S. Preethi - Petitioner
Versus
The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate-Cum-Revenue Divisional Officer and ors. – Respondents
W.A.No.1373 of 2022
Decided On : 01-12-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. C.Prakasam
For the Respondent: Mr. P. Muthukumar, State Govt. Pleader, Mr. Ravi Anantha Padmanabhan for Mr. M. Guruprasad

Proper notice and opportunity as required by the law were provided to the appellant before the resolution of the no-confidence motion.

Headnote:

Panchayat Union - No-confidence motion - Sec.212 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, 1994 - Sec.212(2), Sec.212(4), Sec.212(6), Sec.212(7)

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, elected as Vice Chairman of Kodumudi Panchayat Union, was removed from the post due to a no-confidence motion. The appellant challenged the resolution in a writ petition, alleging lack of proper notice and opportunity.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the notice was dispatched in accordance with the law and the appellant had the opportunity to receive it. The Court upheld the decision of the Writ Court, concluding that there was no violation of the procedure under Sec.212(7) of the Act.

Issues: Alleged lack of proper notice and opportunity for the appellant before the resolution of no-confidence motion.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the appellant was provided with the required notice as per Sec.212(7) of the Act, and there was no violation of the procedure. The appellant's claim of insufficient opportunity was rejected.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.

JUDGMENT :

D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.

The short facts leading to filing of this Intra Court Appeal are as follows:

The appellant was elected as Vice Chairman of Kodumudi Panchayat Union in Erode District. There are totally six ward members in the said Panchayat Union. She was elected as ward member from Ward No.6 of the Panchayat Union in the local body election conducted in the year 2019 and she was successfully elected as Vice President of the Panchayat Union.

    (i) While so, the fellow members moved no-confidence motion against the appellant. Accordingly, as per the procedure contemplated under Sec.212 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, 1994 majority members of the Panchayat Union have given a no-confidence motion notice on 3.2.2021 along with the charges signed by all the members.

(ii) Based on the notice of no-confidence motion, the first respondent served show cause notice dated 4.2.2021 calling for explanation from the appellant and the appellant challenged the show cause notice dated 4.2.2021 in W.P.No.4715 of 2021 and this Court while disposing of the writ petition, has held that the notice was sustained and directed the respondents to provide fifteen days time to the appellant to give reply based on documents.

(iii) On receipt of the reply dated 25.3.2021, the second respondent as per the procedure contemplated under Sec.212(4) of the said Act, had sent a proceedings dated 7.7.2021 to convene a meeting on 3.8.2021 at 11.00 a.m. to decide the no-confidence motion against the appellant. However, the said meeting was cancelled due to some unavoidable reason and the same was communicated under the procedure contemplated under Sec.212(6) of the Act. Thereafter, as per the procedure contemplated under Sec.212(7) of the Act, meeting was fixed to consider the no-confidence motion on 13.8.2021 at 11.00 a.m. and the notice dated 2.8.2021 was served on 7.8.2021.

(iv) The meeting as proposed was conducted on 13.8.2021 where resolution of no-confidence motion against the petitioner was passed. Obviously, the appellant attended the said meeting, after registering her protest, walked out from the meeting. Based on the resolution passed, the appellant was removed from the post of Vice Chairman of the Panchayat Union Council.

(v) Challenging the resolution dated 13.8.2021 preside over by the first respondent, the appellant invoked Article 226 of the Constitution of India in W.P.No.17475 of 2021. The Writ Court upon hearing both sides and on perusal of the record, dismissed the writ petition.

(vi) Aggrieved by the order passed by the Writ Court, the instant appeal is filed before this Court.

2. The primordial contention of the appellant is that the petitioner was not given 7 days clear notice as contemplated under Sec.212(7) of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, 1994 and therefore, no proper opportunity was given to the appellant before passing the impugned resolution in the meeting conducted by the first respondent. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant further contended that the Writ Court failed to consider that the appellant has submitted a detailed representation to the first respondent on 25.3.2021 denying each and every charges, more particularly, the appellant has specifically stated that the no-confidence motion is born out of vengeance for the reason that the appellant prevented the other members of the Council from abusing their official position, by collecting money for each and every works more particularly, for appointment of staffs for the Union and etc. Further, it is contended by the appellant that on 13.8.2021 the first respondent came and presided over the meeting and passed no-confidence motion without giving an opportunity and taking steps to refer the matter to the third respondent.

3. In reply to the aforesaid submission, the learned State Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents stoutly denied the said allegations by stating that the notice was dispatched on 2.8.2021 which reached the concerned post office on 3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top