Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI
Chandradhwaja Majhi – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's background and procedural context. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments regarding notice validity. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. overview of court's review and statutory safeguards. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. interpretation of statutory notice requirements. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court's reasoning on notice issuance and member's receipt. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. compliance with provision regarding notice contents. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. concept of accountability in local governance. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. final ruling on the validity of no-confidence proceedings. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
Judgment :
Sanjeeb K Panigrahi, J.
1. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner seeks a direction from this Court to quash the notice dated 22.10.2025 and the no-confidence meeting held on 11.11.2025 for non-compliance with Section 24 of the Odisha Gram Panchayat Act, 1964, and to protect her continuance as elected Sarpanch in accordance with law.
I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:
(i) The writ petitioner is the elected Sarpanch of Maidalpur Gram Panchayat, Papadahandi Block, District Nabarangpur, having been elected in the PRI El
Procedural safeguards under Section 24 of the Odisha Gram Panchayat Act are mandatory for no-confidence motions; late notice receipt does not invalidate proceedings absent demonstrable prejudice.
Compliance with procedural safeguards under Section 24 of the Odisha Gram Panchayat Act is crucial, but minor deviations that do not demonstrate prejudice may not invalidate no-confidence proceedings....
The court ruled that compliance with procedural safeguards under the Odisha Gram Panchayat Act, 1964 is critical for no-confidence motions, affirming that minor deviations do not invalidate democrati....
The court confirmed that the notice for a No Confidence Motion must comply with statutory requirements; however, procedural safeguards do not invalidate proceedings if legislative intent is met.
Procedural compliance under Section 24 of the Odisha Gram Panchayat Act is mandatory; deviations may invalidate proceedings. The court confirmed that the notice for No Confidence Motion adhered to st....
Compliance with procedural laws in no-confidence motions under the Odisha Grama Panchayats Act is essential, though timing of notice receipt versus issuance holds significance in evaluating valid par....
The court affirmed that compliance with statutory notice provisions in a no confidence motion was sufficient, and challenges based on alleged deficiencies or political motives were unsubstantiated.
Fifteen days notice for a no confidence motion is mandatory under Section 24(2)(c), but mode of service is directory; lack of prejudice can validate proceedings even if procedural irregularities exis....
Statutory requirements for No Confidence Motion must be strictly adhered to, including the notice being accompanied by copies of requisition and resolution, as established under the Odisha Grama Panc....
The mandatory and directory requirements of the notice under Section 24(2)(c) of the Orissa Grama Panchayats Act, 1964 must be fulfilled for the validity of a No Confidence Motion meeting.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
