ORDER :

The order impugned dated 17.10.2017, cancelling the appointment of the writ petitioner as Electrician is under challenge in the present writ petition.

2. The petitioner states that pursuant to the Recruitment Notification issued by the third respondent, he participated in the process of selection for appointment to the post of Electrician. The petitioner states that he possessed the requisite qualification for selection to the post of Electrician. The petitioner participated in the interview on 04.01.2017 and he was appointed as Electrician on 04.01.2017 and joined on 11.01.2017 in Modern Rice Mill, Kallakurichi. While the petitioner was working, the third respondent issued the impugned order dated 17.10.2017, cancelling his appointment on the ground that the selection was confined to SC Candidates alone and no other candidates from other communities were called for, despite the availability of seven candidates from BC and MBC and no written test was conducted. The petitioner states that the order impugned was issued without any notice.

3. The learned counsel for the petit