PARESH UPADHYAY, D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Kumara Rani MeenaMuthiah – Appellant
Versus
Rajah MuthiahChettiar Charitable and Educational Trust, Represented by its Trustee R. M. Palaniappan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
[D. Bharatha Chakravarthy. J.]
[Prayer in O.S.A.No.126 of 2022: Appeal preferred under Order XXXIV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 09.02.2022 in O.A.No.412 of 2021 in C.S.No.223 of 2021.]
[Prayer in O.S.A.No.133 of 2022: Appeal preferred under Order XXXIV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 09.02.2022 in O.A.No.334 of 2021 in C.S.No.198 of 2016.]
[Prayer in O.S.A.No.287 of 2022: Appeal preferred under Order XXXIV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 09.02.2022 in O.A.No.412 of 2021 in C.S.No.223 of 2021.]
A. The Appeals :
1. These Original Side Appeals arise out of the common order dated 09.02.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in A.No.1831 of 2006 and O.A. No.334 of 2001 in C.S.No.198 of 2016 and O.A. No.412 of 2021 in C.S. No.223 of 2021 in and by which the prayers of interim injunction restraining the respondents in the respective applications from putting up any construction in the suit schedule -C- property were rejected.
B. The People :
2. The present set of suits and connected proceedings arise out of the conflict between the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.