IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, JJ.
SP. Chockalingam & Others - Appellant
Versus
Principal Chief Conservator of Forests & Chief Wildlife Warden, Saidapet & Others - Respondent
W.P. Nos. 1830, 4130, 4109 of 2022 & W.M.P. Nos. 1965, 4354, 4265, 4241, 4243 & 4245 of 2022
Decided On : 06-04-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitions concerning vehicle regulations for wildlife protection. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. description of sathyamangalam's ecological significance. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. discussion of traffic safety and regulations. (Para 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
(Prayer in W.P.No.1830 of 2022: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the fourth respondent along with other respondents to impose complete ban of vehicles from 09.00 P.M to 06.00 P.M and ban of heavy commercial vehicles between 06.00 P.M to 06.00 A.M on the stretch of road between Bannari and Karapallam in NH 948.
W.P.No.4130 of 2022: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ in the nature of Declaration, to declare that the Notification bearing Ref.No.18425/2017(C2), dt.23.11.2018 prohibiting movement of Commercial Vehicle from using the Ghat Road between Bannari Check Post to Dhimbam stretch between 06.00 P.M to 06.00 A.M of next day and subsequent Notification bearing Ref.No.Na.Ka.No.18425/2017 (C2) dt. 07.01.2019 prohibiting movement of all vehicles such as Commercial LMV, passenger four wheelers, public transport from using the Ghat Road between Bannari Check Post to Dhimbam stretch between 09.00 P.M to 06.00 A.M of next day issued by the third respondent Collector as being violative of Art.19(1)(d) and Art.19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to impose reasonable restrictions after giving public hearing to all concerned.
W.P.No.4109 of 2022: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the Notification published in the Gazette No.2 of Erode District dated 07.01.2019 issued by the first respondent and quash the same.)
Common Order
D. Bharatha Chakravarhy, J.
1. Prelude:
In these Writ Petitions, we are called upon to resolve yet another Man- Animal Conflict, their respective claims of habitat, natural landscape and resources. In Constitutional parlance, to what extent the restrictions can be on the Fundamental Rights of the humans under Article 19(1)(d) for freedom of movement and Article 19(1)(g) for freedom to carry on Trade and business, in pursuit of the avowed directive principles as enshrined in Article 48A.(g) to protect and improve environment, safeguarding of forests and wildlife and the fundamental duty under Article 51 A.(g) to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, takes, rivers and wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures?”
2. The Petitions:
2.1. Mr.S.P.Chockalingam, an advocate practicing in this Court and an avid wildlife lover, who has been associated with various litigations relating to wildlife, has filed W.P.No.1830 of 2022 in respect of the Dhimbam Ghat Rod, which passes through the Sathyamangalam Tiger Reserve, for a direction to the respondents to impose complete ban on vehicles from 9.00 P.M. to 6.00 A.M. and ban on heavy commercial vehicles between 6.00 P.M. To 6.00 A.M., on the stretch of the road between Bannari and Karappallam in NH 918.
2.2. After this Court passed an interim direction to implement the already existing notification banning night traffic in the road aforesaid, by an interim order dated 08.02.2022, Mr.P.L.Sundaram, former Member of Legislative Assembly representing the Bhavani Sagar Constituency had filed W.P.No.4130 of 2022, to declare the Notifications dated 23.11.2018 and 07.01.2019 issued by the District Collector, Erode, prohibiting movement of vehicles using the Ghat Road between Bannari Check-post to Dhimbam Stretch between 9.00 P.M to 6.00 A.M as violative of Article 19 (1) (d) and Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to impose reasonable restrictions after giving public hearing to all concerned.
2.3. Mr.S.Kannaiyan, a farmer and resident of Thalavadi village, has filed W.P. No.4109 of 2022 to quash the same notification dated
Any failure on part of the designated authorities, contractor, consultant or concessionaire in maintaining the safety standards of public roads will attract the penal consequences provided under Sect....
Railways must enforce strict speed limits of 50 kmph daytime and 25 kmph nighttime in elephant corridors to prevent collisions, as mandated by Supreme Court; violation at 70 kmph held negligent.
Only the designated Highway Authority has the jurisdiction to grant or cancel permissions for temporary stalls on highway margins, and such actions must comply with safety regulations and proper proc....
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways has already issued the Motor Vehicles (Driving) Regulations, 2017 which should be implemented by the State Governments and Union Territories strictly.
Point of law:Right to use footways – Encroachment - Right to use footway or footpath is a right of citizens. All this has to be appreciated in the light of the fundamental right guaranteed under Arti....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.