Ananja Perumal vs Krishnan - 2022 Supreme(Mad) 1397

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1397

R. VIJAYAKUMAR
Ananja Perumal – Appellant
Versus
Krishnan – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:C. Jawahar Ravindran, Advocate. For the Respondent:S. Natarajan, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer in C.M.P(MD)No.8931 of 2021: Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Order 41, Rule 3(A) r/w Order 42, Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Code, to condone the delay of 5002 days in preferring the above Second Appeal against the order, dated 04.07.2005 made by the Sub Court, Aruppukottai in Cross Objection in A.S.No.42 of 2003.

S.A(MD)SR.No.53848 of 2021: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment and decree of the District Munsif, Aruppukottai in O.S.No.362 of 1999, dated 14.01.2003 and the judgment and decree of the Sub Court, Aruppukottai in Cross objection filed the respondent herein in A.S.No.42 of 2003, dated 04.07.2005 and allow this appeal and decree the suit as prayed for.)

1. The present application has been filed in S.A.(MD)SR.No.53848 of 2021 to condone the delay of 5002 days in filing the Second Appeal.

2. The present appellant in the Second Appeal was the plaintiff in O.S.No.362 of 1999 before the District Munsif Court, Aruppukottai. The plaintiff has prayed for the relief of declaration of title and permanent injunction. The plaintiff has further prayed for permanent injunction, declaration, mandatory in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document