IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. BHARATHIDASAN, J.
D. Ponniyen Selvan & Others - Appellant
Versus
Inspector of Police, SPE:CBI:ACB, Chennai, Rep. through its Public Prosecutor - Respondent
Crl.O.P. Nos. 22832, 22811, 22795 & 23676 of 2021 & Crl.M.P. Nos. 12459, 12468, 12452 & 13037 of 2021
Decided On : 01-04-2022
Criminal Conspiracy - Admission Scam - Section 420 IPC, Sections 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act - The court quashed the criminal proceedings against the petitioners in C.C.Nos.533, 530 and 532 of 2020 and 535 of 2021 pending on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puducherry.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, representing various medical colleges in Puducherry, were accused of criminal conspiracy and cheating in the admission process for post graduate medical courses. The allegations included denying admission to students selected by CENTAC, admitting ineligible candidates, and collecting exorbitant fees.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the materials available on record did not contain the necessary ingredients for the offence under Section 420 IPC. It concluded that no case was made out against the petitioners and allowed the trial to continue would only lead to abuse of process of Court.
Issues: The issues involved in the case included the applicability of fees fixed by the Fees Fixation Committee to deemed to be universities, the admission process for post graduate medical courses, and the alleged criminal conspiracy and cheating by the petitioners.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that fraudulent or dishonest inducement and a guilty intention are essential ingredients for the offence under Section 415 IPC and Section 420 IPC. It also highlighted the importance of intentional inducement and the absence of fraudulent or dishonest intention at the time of making the promise.
Final Decision: The court quashed the criminal proceedings against the petitioners in C.C.Nos.533, 530 and 532 of 2020 and 535 of 2021 pending on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puducherry.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petitions have been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to call for the records in C.C.Nos.533, 530 and 532 of 2020 and 535 of 2021 pending on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puducherry and quash the same.)
Common Order
1. The issues involved in all these criminal original petitions are one and the same and hence they are heard together and disposed of by means of this common order.
2. The petitioners who are arrayed as A9, A7, A8 and A11, have filed the above criminal original petitions seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.Nos.533, 530 and 532 of 2020 and 535 of 2021, respectively pending on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puducherry, for the offence punishable under Section 420 I.P.C.
3. The brief facts leading to filing of these quash petitions, are as follows:
(i) The petitioners are representing various medical colleges in the Union Territory of Puducherry. Based on source information that, the officials of Centralised Admission Committee (CENTAC) of Government of Puducherry and Management of seven medical colleges, both self financing as well as deemed to be universities have deliberately denied admission to the students who were selected in the counseling conducted by the CENTAC to the respective medical colleges and admitted students who were not selected by CENTAC, in various post graduate (PG) medical courses, a FIR has been registered against 13 named accused and other unknown officials of Government of Puducherry and CENTAC, in RC MA1 2017 A 0020, dated 18.09.2017, for offence under Section 120-B r/w Section 420 I.P.C. and Sections 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Out of the 13 accused, A1 to A6 are officials of CENTAC, and A7 to A13 are representing various medical colleges in the Union Territory of Puducherry.
(ii) The above FIR has been registered on the ground that, A1 to A6 entered into a criminal conspiracy with A7 to A13, in the month of March-July 2017, relating to the admission of students in the PG Medical Courses in the Union Territory of Puducherry and in furtherance of the criminal conspiracy, the accused public servants abused their official position and cheated the bona fide students who were issued with provisional admission certificate during counseling by CENTAC and denied them the seat which they were otherwise allocated after due admission process and facilitated the private medical colleges to admit students who were not sponsored by CENTAC, thereby allowed the private medical colleges to collect exorbitant fees and deprived admission to genuine candidates.
(iii) It is further stated in the FIR that, the admission to the post graduate courses in the medical institutions were made through the common counseling based on the marks obtained by them in National Eligibility Entrance Test (NEET). In the Union Territory of Puducherry, there are 318 post graduate / diploma seats in medicines and out of which 162 seats were earmarked as Government quota and the balance 156 seats were earmarked for management quota. The first phase of counseling was conducted by CENTAC on 11.05.2017, the second phase was held on 19.05.2017, a mop up counseling was held on 29.05.2017 and final counseling was held on 31.05.2017. Pursuant to the criminal conspiracy, the first phase of counseling was held without even notifying the fees payable by the students and the same was intimated only after completion of first phase of counseling. In furtherance of the conspiracy, after issuing provisional admission certificate, no efforts were made by A1 to A3 to verify the number of students admitted as against the students who were issued with the provisional admission certificate and they have also not taken into consideration of those students while calculating the vacancy position and they have wrongly stated in the website that all the students who were issued with the provisional admission certificate by CENTAC, were admi
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the materials available on record did not contain the necessary ingredients for the offence under Section 420 IPC, and the petitioners were no....
The imposition of excessive fees for medical college admission violates the equality principle under Article 14, compromising access to education for economically disadvantaged students.
The court affirmed that admissions obtained through fraud are invalid, emphasizing that principles of natural justice do not apply in such cases.
The court ruled that fraudulent admissions invalidate eligibility, despite procedural errors by the University, emphasizing the need for transparency and adherence to cut-off criteria.
Criminal process cannot be utilized for any oblique purpose – Court should quash those criminal cases where chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak and no useful purpose is likely to be served by....
The absence of regulations regarding the demand for a service bond from government doctors and the need for regulations to address this issue in the context of PG medical admissions.
Criminal proceedings ought not to be scuttled at the initial stage. Quashing of a complaint should rather be an exception and a rarity than an ordinary rule. Considering the allegations made in the c....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.