Back
R. SUBRAMANIAN, R. KALAIMATHI
P. Sidharthan – Appellant
Versus
Government of Puducherry, Rep. by Secretary to Government (Health) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order in W.P.Nos.12347 of 2017 passed on 30.06.2017.
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order in W.P.Nos.14393 of 2017 passed on 30.06.2017.
These two appeals arise out of two Writ Petitions filed by the appellant / petitioner in W.P.Nos.12347 & 14393 of 2017.
2.In W.P.No.12347 of 2017, the petitioner sought for a declaration that non-implementation of the selection of the petitioner in accordance with merit under the Government counselling conducted on 04.05.2017 is illegal and unconstitutional and consequently, admit the petitioner in terms of the allotment order dated 04.05.2017 in M.S.(General Surgery) for the academic year 2017-2018 in the 4th respondent Institute / Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences.
3.The other Writ Petition in W.P.No.14393 of 2017 has been filed by the petitioner in W.P.No.12347 of 2017 seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, challenging the rejection letter dated 02.06.2017 issued by the 1 respondent therein namely, the Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS) and to direct the 1st respondent to adm
The enforcement of penalty and debarment for non-joining of allocated seats was deemed too harsh and violative of Article 21-A of the Constitution of India.
A retrospective imposition of a mandatory service bond on medical students, which was not disclosed in the official counseling portal or prospectus at the time of admission, is arbitrary, illegal, an....
The court upheld the validity of state-mandated compulsory service bonds for medical postgraduates, affirming they serve public interest and do not violate constitutional rights.
Admissions in educational institutions must strictly adhere to centralized counselling processes as mandated by precedents to maintain fairness and transparency in selections.
A candidate's initial acceptance of admission can be revoked before the joining deadline, preserving their eligibility for future vacancies.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the admission of students to the MBBS course must adhere to the proper procedure for filling vacant seats as per the judgment of the Apex Cour....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
