M. Udayakumar vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Theni

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1593

R. SUBRAMANIAN, N. SATHISH KUMAR
M. Udayakumar – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Theni – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:N. Mohideen Basha, Advocate. For the Respondent: T. Senthil Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Mahila Court (Session Fast Track) Theni, made in S.C.No.50 of 2014 dated 15.12.2020.)

R. Subramanian, J.

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants / A1 to A3 as against the conviction and sentence, dated 15.12.2020, made in S.C.No.50 of 2014, by the Mahila Court (Session Fast Track) Theni.

2. The appellants / A1 to A3 stood convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment as detailed hereunder:

	Conviction U/s.	Sentence	Fine amount
A-1 & A-2	302 IPC	To undergo life imprisonment	To pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- each, in default, to undergo two years simple imprisonment.
A-1 & A-2	307 r/w 34 IPC	To undergo 7 years rigorous imprisonment	To pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- each, in default, to undergo one year simple imprisonment.
A-3	302 r/w 34 IPC	To undergo life imprisonment	To pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/-, in default, to undergo two years simple imprisonment.
	307 IPC	To undergo 7 years rigorous imprisonment	To pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/-, in default, to undergo one year simple imprisonment.

3. The brief facts of the prosecution is as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1593

R. SUBRAMANIAN, N. SATHISH KUMARM. Udayakumar – AppellantVersusState Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Theni – Respondent

R. SUBRAMANIAN, N. SATHISH KUMAR
M. Udayakumar – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Theni – Respondent