BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
R. Alaguraj - Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by its Secretary, Chennai & Others - Respondent
W.P. (MD). No. 11319 of 2019 & W.M.P.(MD) Nos. 8638 of 2019 & 11018 of 2020
Decided On : 27-04-2022
Mandamus - De-promotion - Educational Qualification - G.O.Ms.No.144, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (M) Department dated 20.11.2017 - Madurai Kamaraj University pre-foundation course - SSLC - Annamalai University case - G.O.Ms.No.107, Personnel and Administrative Department, dated 18.08.2009
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner seeks to forbear the respondents from de-promoting him from the post of Road Inspector Grade-I to the post of Road Inspector Grade-II or as Gang Mazdoor based on the contention that the pre-foundation course is equivalent to SSLC.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioner's promotions were in violation of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Government Order, and that the petition was premature as no order of reversion had been passed.
Issues: The main issue was the equivalence of the pre-foundation course to SSLC and the validity of the petitioner's promotions in light of the Government Orders and the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Ratio Decidendi: The promotions granted after the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, which was implemented by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.107, were considered invalid, and the court found no reason to consider the relief sought for in the writ petition.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and there was no order as to costs.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from de-promoting the Petitioner from the post of Road Inspector Grade I (Skilled Assistant Grade I) to the post of Road Inspector Grade II (Skilled Assistant Grade II) or as Gang Mazdoor on the ground that the prefoundation course is not equivalent to SSLC.)
1. The Writ of Mandamus has been filed to forbear the respondents from de-promoting the petitioner from the post of Road Inspector Grade-I (Skilled Assistant Grade-I) to the post of Road Inspector Grade-II (Skilled Assistant Grade-II) or as Gang Mazdoor on the ground that the prefoundation course is not equivalent to SSLC.
2. The petitioner is presently working as Road Inspector Grade-I (Skilled Assistant Grade-I) in the Highways Department. He was initially appointed as Gang Mazdoor.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that the educational qualification fixed for appointment to the post of Gang Mazdoor was V-Standard pass. However, he possesses the qualification for the post of Gang Mazdoor, but not passed SSLC (X-Standard). The Service Rules for promotion to the post of Road Inspector Grade-II (presently known as Skilled Assistant Grade-II) prescribes the requisite educational qualification as SSLC. Besides the qualification, one must possess the experience as Gang Mazdoor for a period of five years. 25% of the post of Skilled Assistant Grade-II would be filled by way of promotion from the category of Gang Mazdoor and the remaining 75% will be filled up by direct recruitment. Admittedly, the petitioner is not possessing the requisite educational qualification of SSLC. However, it is contended that the petitioner has passed the pre-foundation course conducted by the Madurai Kamaraj University, which is an equivalent qualification to SSLC. As per the University Rules, candidates, who have not completed VIII-Standard were permitted to study pre-foundation course, which is an introductory course for a period of one year. The Government vide G.O.Ms.No.528, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, dated 18.05.1985 made clear that the pre-foundation course of Madurai Kamaraj University is to be recognised as equivalent to SSLC qualification for entry into public services in the State. Based on the above Government Order, the petitioner has joined the pre-foundation course and completed the same and thereafter, promoted to the post of Skilled Assistant Grade-II and further promoted to the post of Skilled Assistant Grade-I.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner made a submission that the petitioner was promoted as Road Inspector Grade-II in the year 2009 and was further promoted as Road Inspector Grade-I in the year 2014 and as of now, he is working as Skilled Assistant Grade-I. While so, the respondents are initiating steps to revert the petitioner on the ground that the pre-foundation course undergone by the petitioner is not equivalent to the SSLC qualification in the State of Tamil Nadu as per G.O.Ms.No.144, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (M) Department dated 20.11.2017. It is contended that the said Government Order is not applicable to the petitioner, as he was already promoted as Skilled Assistant Grade-II in year 2009 and further as Skilled Assistant Grade-I in the year 2014. G.O.Ms.No. 144 was issued in the year 2017 and therefore, the said order cannot be retrospectively implemented so as to revert the petitioner from the post of Skilled Assistant Grade-I to Skilled Assistant Grade-II or Gang Mazdoor.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner reiterated that when the prefoundation course is recognised by the Government of Tamil Nadu as early as in the year 1985 and the petitioner underwent the course and got promotions in the year 2009 and 2014, there is no other reason to revert the petitioner to the post of Road Inspector Grade-II or Gang Mazdoor based on the Government Order
The validity of promotions in light of Government Orders and the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
The delay in decision making by the respondents deprived the petitioners of an opportunity of getting promoted, leading to the court allowing the petition for the petitioners and three other applican....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that educational qualifications prescribed by government orders and upheld by Supreme Court decisions are crucial for promotions in public servi....
The court held that educational qualifications for promotions in public services must strictly adhere to G.O.107, invalidating prior recognitions of foundational courses when petitioners failed to ch....
Promotion in public service requires adherence to specific educational qualifications mandated by law, which the petitioner's Pre-Foundation Course did not satisfy.
The completion of the course prior to the judgment in Annamalai University case made the petitioner eligible for the Special Officer post, and principles of promissory estoppel, legitimate expectatio....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.