SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Mad) 3518

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT 
Shamim Ahmed, J.
T.Koodalingam - Petitioners
Versus
The Director General of Police and ors. - Respondents
WP(MD)No.5620 of 2022
Decided On : 17-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mrs.Porkodi Kannan
For the Respondent:Mr.P.Thambidurai, Government Advocate, Mr.P.Gunasekaran

Promotion in public service requires adherence to specific educational qualifications mandated by law, which the petitioner's Pre-Foundation Course did not satisfy.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India, Article 226 - Writ of Mandamus - Promotion to police service - Petitioner sought notional promotion as Assistant Commissioner of Police based on the Pre-Foundation Course qualification - Respondents denied promotion citing lack of SSLC qualification as per statutory provisions. (Paras 1, 2, 10, 24)

(B) Promotion Eligibility - The court held that the Pre-Foundation Course is not equivalent to the required SSLC qualification, hence the petitioner was not eligible for promotion. (Paras 3, 24)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a retired police officer, sought notional promotion to Assistant Commissioner, arguing that he completed a course equivalent to SSLC after previously being denied promotion due to lack of qualification. (Paras 1, 2, 10)

Findings of Court:
The court dismissed the writ petition on grounds of laches and lack of merits, affirming that the petitioner's retrospective claim for promotion was untenable. (Paras 24, 25)

Issues: The main issues were whether the Pre-Foundation Course fulfilled the educational qualifications required for promotion and the legitimacy of the delayed representation by the petitioner. (Paras 1, 6, 12)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that only qualifications meeting statutory requirements are valid for promotion and rejected the application due to significant delay, referencing established legal standards on delay and qualifications for public service. (Paras 12, 24)

Result: Writ Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. writ of mandamus for promotion due to qualifications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. writ petition filed for promotion based on qualifications. (Para 4)
3. arguments on eligibility for promotion based on educational qualifications. (Para 5 , 6)
4. arguments presented regarding qualifications and merit. (Para 7)
5. time-bar and delay in legal redress evaluated. (Para 9 , 10)
6. laches and time-barred claims in employment cases. (Para 12 , 20 , 24)
7. jurisdiction of courts in condoning delays in petitions. (Para 22 , 23)
8. dismissal of writ petition for lack of merits. (Para 25)

ORDER :

Shamim Ahmed, J.

1. This Writ Petition has been filed, under the Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to accept the Pre-Foundation Course qualification of the Petitioner and to grant him a notional promotion as an Assistant Commissioner of Police with consequential monetary and pensionary service benefits.

2. The facts of case, in a nutshell, led to filing of this Writ Petition and necessary for disposal of same, are as follows:-

(a) The Petitioner was enlisted as a Police Constable Grade-II on 15.10.1977 in the Tamil Nadu Police with the qualification of Discontinued SSLC-1976 and then, he was promoted as a Head Constable on 27.08.1984 and was further promoted as a Sub Inspector of Police (AR) in 1991 and thereafter, he was promoted as an Inspector of Police on 14.02.2003.

(b) In 2010, when the Petitioner submitted an application, seeking promotion to the post of Assistant Commissioner of Police (AR), his name was not included in the list for promotion to the said post, due to lack of educational qualification (SSLC qualification). Thereafter, in 2013, the Petitioner passed the Pre-Foundation Course offered by the Madurai Kamaraj University, which is equivalent to the SSLC qualification. The Petitioner made several representations, seeking promotion. The Petitioner retired on 29.02.2016. In 2021, the Petitioner made a last representation on 29.11.2021, but the same has not been considered till today. Hence, this Writ Petition has been filed, seeking the relief as stated supra.

3. In the counter affidavit filed by the Respondents 1 and 2, it is stated as follows:-

(a) The Petitioner was enlisted as a Police Constable in the Tamil Nadu Police in 1997, with the qualification of “Discontinued SSLC” and he was promoted as a Head Constable on 27.08.1984 and then, promoted as a Sub-Inspector of Police (AR) on 31.12.1991 and thereafter, promoted as an Inspector of Police (AR) on 26.02.2003. Since his educational qualification was “SSLC Discontinued”, his name was not considered for promotion to the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police (Category 2) for the year 2009-2010.

(b) Thereafter, in 2013, the Petitioner passed the Pre-Foundation Course offered by the Madurai Kamarajar University on 11.11.2013, which is equivalent to Secondary School Leaving Certificate, as per the G.O.Ms.No.528, dated 18.05.1985. However, as per the qualification prescribed in Sub-Rule (D) of Rule 4 of the Special Rules for the Tamil Nadu Police Service, for appointment as Deputy Superintendent of Police (Category 2), the Petitioner is educationally not qualified for promotion to the said post.

(c) The Pre-Foundation course passed by the Petitioner is not eligible for admission to the College Course. Further, as per the G.O.Ms.No.107, dated 18.08.2009, the Government have ordered that the Degrees, obtained through Open University Scheme, after passing SSLC and HSCt (+2) in regular scheme, alone will be recognized for the purpose of employment or promotion in Public Service.

(d) As per Government Letter No.33448/M/2010-4, dated 03.12.2010, it is clarified that a degree awarded by the Open Universities after passing Pre-Foundation Course and Two Years Foundation Course through Open University cannot be recognised as a degree as per the norms of the UGC. Further, as per G.O.(Ms.) No.144, dated 20.11.2017, the Pre- Foundation Cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top