IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R. SWAMINATHAN, J.
P.R. Srinivasan - Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner H.R.& C.E., Department, Chennai - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 12918 of 2022 & W.M.P. Nos. 12418 & 12419 of 2022
Decided On : 15-05-2022
Rath Festival - Temple Car Festival - The Tamil Nadu H.R.&C.E. Act, 1959 - The Tamil Nadu Government Order G.O.Ms.No.413 dated 06.12.2012 - Sarika Vs Shri Mahakaleshwar Mandir Committee (2018) 17 SCC 112
Fact of the Case:
The writ petitioner, the Hereditary Trustee of a temple, sought permission to hold the annual car festival, which had been disrupted due to Covid restrictions. The 5th respondent issued a communication instructing not to hold the festival, leading to the filing of the writ petition.
Finding of the Court:
The impugned communication was found to be without jurisdiction and quashed. The Court emphasized the importance of temple car festivals and the duty of authorities to ensure safety standards are met. The petitioner's undertaking and existing safety measures led to the court allowing the festival to proceed.
Issues: Jurisdiction of the 5th respondent to issue the communication, adherence to safety standards for temple car festivals, and the duty of authorities to facilitate customary religious festivals.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the 5th respondent's communication was without jurisdiction and emphasized the duty of authorities to ensure safety standards for temple car festivals. It also highlighted the constitutional obligation to preserve religious practices and the duty of the government to provide basic amenities during large gatherings.
Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the festival was permitted to proceed with the direction to ensure adherence to safety standards.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the 5th respondent leading to pass the impugned order dated 13.05.2022 and quash the same.)
1. 'Our village will face divine wrath if the proposed Rath festival is not held tomorrow' – This fervent prayer of the writ petitioner made the Court to hold an emergent sitting from Nagercoil and conduct the case through Whatsapp.
2. The writ petitioner is the Hereditary Trustee of Arulmighu Abheeshta Varadarajaswamy Temple, Papparapatti Agraharam, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District. His case is that every year the temple has been celebrating its car festival. The procession starts from the temple and runs through the four streets around the temple.
3. The procession takes about four hours and the distance covered is around half a kilometre. There are some eighty houses situated. This festival was being held year after year for the last eight decades without any break till the outbreak of Covid. Due to the restrictions imposed by the Administration, for the last two years the event could not be held. Following the lifting of restrictions, steps were taken to resume the holding of the festival. The petitioner wrote to the various Departments. A co-ordination meeting was also held. All the arrangements have been made. At this juncture, the 5th respondent put spokes in the chariot wheels by issuing the impugned communication on 13.05.2022 instructing the Fit Person as well as the hereditary trustee not to hold the car festival. Certain reasons have been set out therein. This necessitated the filing of the present writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner reiterated all the contentions set out in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and called upon this Court to quash the same and allow the writ petition.
4. Mr.R.Shunmugasundaram, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr.Muthukumar, learned State Government Pleader appeared for the respondents. I am happy to record that the learned Advocate General did not adopt an adversarial stand. He stated that the Government does not oppose the holding of the event. Their sole concern is the safety of the members of the general public. He submitted to the Court that on account of failure to adhere to safety standards, tragedy struck a similar procession in Thanjavur District recently. He emphasized that such accidents should not recur. According to him, after the defects pointed out in the impugned communication are rectified, the procession can very well be conducted and the State may not have any objection.
5. I carefully considered the rival contentions and went through the materials on record. The impugned communication had been issued by the Inspector, H.R.&C.E., Department, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District. An Inspector is not one of the authorities listed in section 8 of The Tamil Nadu H.R.&C.E.Act,1959. No statutory provision empowers him to issue the impugned communication either to the Fit Person or to the hereditary trustee. It is is absolutely without jurisdiction and hence quashed. Since the stand of the respondents is evident, I do not stop here and I am inclined to mould the relief.
6. Car festival is one of the important features of many of the temples in Tamil Nadu. We are familiar with the expression ie., the street through which the temple chariot passes. Year after year such Car festivals are held. They serve a vital social function also as people cutting across all sections and castes participate and mingle together while pulling the chariot. In any temple, there will be two idols. One is called 'Moolavar', usually made of stone and is permanently fixed inside the sanctum sanctorum. On the other hand, 'Utsavar' idol is made of metal and meant to be taken in procession. We can conceive of certain categories of people such as very old or severely physically challenged, who are not in a position to vis
The duty of authorities to ensure safety standards for temple car festivals and the constitutional obligation to preserve religious practices.
Court records assurance of compliance with temple festival guidelines, grants liberty for remedy on violation.
Court directs temple festival conduct by authorities without private privileges, mandating plastic ban and communal cleanup.
The custom of celebrating the temple festival annually and the use of Mandamus to ensure peaceful conduct.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of following specific procedures for conducting temple festivals to avoid conflicts and maintain law and order.
The court emphasizes the need for police protection during religious festivals while recognizing the rights of multiple parties to celebrate.
Court directs Peace Committee to assess temple festival feasibility amid disputes and pending civil suit without injunction.
Disputes regarding individual honors in religious festivals are subject to adjudication under Section 63(e) of the HR & CE Act, and existing judicial orders preventing discriminatory honors must be s....
Cooperation with the Peace Committee Meeting and consideration of law and order condition are crucial factors in granting permission for conducting festivals.
The fundamental rights to assemble peaceably and practice religion, as well as the significance of centuries-old customs and religious practices, were central to the judgment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.