SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 1751

G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
Sathyakala Rajangam – Appellant
Versus
E. Vedavanam – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:M/s. A. Saravanan, M/s. R. Shivakumar, Advocates. For the Respondent:R1, R. Baskar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records relating to C.C.No.7661 of 2014 on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate at Egmore, Chennai, for an offence under Section 494 r/w.107 of IPC and quash the same insofar as the petitioner is concerned.

This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records relating to C.C.No.7661 of 2014 on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate at Egmore, Chennai, for an offence under Section 494 r/w.107 of IPC and quash the same insofar as the petitioner is concerned.)

Common Order

1. These Criminal Original Petitions are filed to call for the records in C.C.No.7661 of 2014 on the file of X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore and to quash the same.

2. Complaint in C.C.No.7661 of 2014 was filed by the first respondent for the offence under Section 494 r/w. 107 IPC. The case of the first respondent, in brief, is as follows:-

First accused is the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.472 of 2016 and second accused is the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.831 of 2016. First respondent is the complainant in C.C.No.7661 of 2014 and he is the father of Dr.Pinky Vedavanam. Pinky was m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top