Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
S. Thilagam – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the first respondent herein in Government Letter No.1516/E1/2013-3 dated 25.04.2013 and quash the same and to consequently direct the first respondent herein to include the name of the petitioner in the appropriate place in the panel for promotion to the post of Assistant Director of Rural Development Department for the year 2009-2010 and to promote the petitioner as such, with retrospective effect from the date of promotion of the petitioner immediate junior therein and to grant the petitioner all consequential benefits.)
1. The order impugned dated 25.04.2013 declining the request of the writ petitioner to include her name in the panel of Block Development Officers fit for promotion to the Post of Assistant Director of Rural Development is under challenge in the present writ petition.
2. The writ petitioner was recruited as Trainee Assistant by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission in the year 1976. She was promoted as Assistant in the year 1984, she was further promoted as Extension Officer in the year
The disciplinary authority has the discretion to assess the evidence and form an opinion on the nature of the allegations, and relief sought based on assumptions regarding the framing of charges cann....
The withdrawal of a charge memo does not necessarily nullify the proceedings, and pendency of disciplinary proceedings can be a valid reason for denying promotion.
The court emphasized that the disciplinary proceedings were conducted in accordance with the procedures under the Discipline and Appeal Rules, and the scope of judicial review was limited in this cas....
Government servants are entitled to promotion after the punishment period if otherwise eligible, and government letters cannot impose restrictions contrary to statutory rules.
The charge memo must contain specific charges and be issued in accordance with the relevant rules, and promotions should not be denied based on stage-managed allegations after the crucial promotion d....
Pending disciplinary proceedings justify deferment of promotion without violating employee rights.
Competent disciplinary authority expected to conclude proceedings expeditiously; petitioner's cooperation essential for entitlement to relief.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
