Back
M. SUNDAR
G. Elumalai – Appellant
Versus
Raichand Daga – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Arbitration Original Petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to appoint an Arbitrator to sort out the issue between the petitioner and the respondents regarding the outstanding amount of Rs.66,28,797/- along with interest for the construction work completed by the petitioner as per the agreement dated 01.02.2017.)
1. This order will dispose of the captioned 'Arbitration Original Petition' [hereinafter 'Arb OP' for the sake of convenience and clarity].
2. Proceedings made by this Court in the earlier listings of the captioned Arb OP on 17.03.2022, 31.03.2022 and 21.04.2022 read as follows:
Proceedings dated 17.03.2022:
'Captioned 'Arbitration Original Petition' [hereinafter 'Arb OP' for the sake of convenience and clarity] has been presented in this Court on 20.10.2021 under Section 11 of 'The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act No.26 of 1996)' [hereinafter 'A and C Act' for the sake of convenience and clarity].
2. Mr.R.Ramachandran, learned counsel for petitioner who is before this Court submits that captioned Arb OP is predicated on an 'agreement dated 01.02.2017 and described as 'Construction Agreement' bet
The court emphasized the importance of seeking redressal through the appropriate legal channels, preserving the rights of the petitioner while disposing of the limited legal drill under Section 11 of....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the narrow scope of examination under Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, confining the court's intervention to the ex....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the narrow scope of examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement under Section 11(6) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as ....
The main legal point established is the court's adherence to the narrow examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement under Section 11(6A) and the emphasis on expeditious disposal of Secti....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of a legal drill under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the expeditious disposal of petitions under ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the conclusive decision on the limitation plea and the importance of expeditious disposal of arbitration matters.
The Court has the authority to downsize the number of members of an Arbitral Tribunal in a Section 11 legal drill based on the nature of arbitrable disputes and other determinants.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the narrow scope of examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and th....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the statutory perimeter under Section 11(6A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, confines the examination of the existence of an ar....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
