IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
G. Prabhu - Appellant
Versus
The Superintending Engineer/CEDC/WEST, Chennai & Others - Respondent
W.P. No. 15110 of 2022
Decided On : 17-06-2022
Mandamus - Electricity Service Connection - The court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's application for electricity service connection and provide a fair hearing to the petitioner and the rival claimant before passing final orders.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, serving in the Indian Military, sought a Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider his representation for electricity service connection for a property he claims to have constructed in his wife's name.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was a rival claim over the property, but the dispute did not relate to the electricity service connection sought by the petitioner. It directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's application and provide a fair hearing to both the petitioner and the rival claimant before passing final orders.
Issues: Dispute over property ownership and electricity service connection application.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the dispute over property ownership did not relate to the electricity service connection sought by the petitioner, and therefore directed the respondent to consider the application and provide a fair hearing to both parties.
Final Decision: The court directed the respondent to pass final orders on the petitioner's application for electricity service connection within six weeks, after affording a fair hearing to the petitioner and the rival claimant.
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 11.05.2022 and consequently provide him electricity service connection in Application No.20009458022256 dated 08.02.2022.)
1. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking for a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 11.05.2022 requesting the respondents to provide electricity service connection in his name based on his application dated 08.02.2022.
3. The petitioner claims that he is serving in Indian Military as Havildhar. According to him, he has constructed a new house in his wife's name, who had purchased the same on 06.07.2020. The property is situated in S.No.280/3, (Ward A) Block No.35, admeasuring 1250 sq.ft. in Plot No.12, Bharath Avenue Annex, Mittanamalli Village, Avadi Taluk, Thiruvallur District.
4. According to the petitioner, the building plan for the construction of the house has also been approved. The petitioner has applied for electricity service connection for the aforementioned house in his name on 08.02.2022. He has also submitted another representation dated 11.05.2022 with the respondent for the said purpose. Since his electricity service connection application and his representation dated 08.02.2022 has not been considered till date, he has filed this writ petition.
5. Heard Mr.R.Swarnavel, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.C.Jai Venkatesh, learned standing counsel forTNEB accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
6. On instructions, the learned standing counsel for the respondents would submit that there is a rival claim over the same property, for which, electricity service connection is sought for by the petitioner. He would submit that a civil suit is also pending and injunction has been granted in favour of the rival claimant against the petitioner. As seen from the notice dated 23.08.2021, received from the rival claimant Mr.G.Nehru Prasad by the respondents, there seems to be a dispute with regard to the ownership of the property. However, the said dispute does not relate to the electricity service connection sought for by the petitioner.
7. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the application submitted by the petitioner seeking for grant of electricity service connection in his name is considered on merits and in accordance with law after affording a fair hearing to the petitioner as well as the rival claimant Mr.G.Nehru Prasad, who has sent a notice to the respondents calling upon them not to grant electricity service connection in favour of the petitioner.
8. For the forgoing reasons, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to pass final orders on the petitioner's application dated 08.02.2022 followed by his representation dated 11.05.2022 seeking for grant of electricity service connection in his name for the property situated in S.No.280/3, (Ward A) Block No.35, admeasuring 1250 sq.ft. in Plot No.12, Bharath Avenue Annex, Mittanamalli Village, Avadi Taluk, Thiruvallur District. within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after affording a fair hearing to the petitioner as well as the rival claimant Mr.G.Nehru Prasad and any other necessary party, whom the 3rd respondent deems fit to enquire, including granting them the right of personal hearing.
9. With the aforesaid directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
The court emphasized the importance of affording a fair hearing to all parties involved in the dispute over electricity service connection for the property.
The court's decision was based on the principle that the dispute over property ownership should not prejudice the consideration of the petitioner's application for electricity service connection.
The court emphasized the need for a fair hearing and consideration of applications for electricity service connection in accordance with the law, despite the pending ownership dispute.
The claim for Electricity Service Connection did not arise as there was no one residing in the subject property and no activities were going on. The parties were directed to approach the Competent Ci....
The High Court has the authority under Article 226 to direct statutory electricity distribution authorities to process service connection applications within a specified timeframe, ensuring administr....
A property owner is entitled to receive electricity service, and utility providers are authorized to erect necessary infrastructure to facilitate such connection, provided ownership is established an....
Electricity connection, a basic amenity, cannot be denied pending partition suit absent restraint order.
Disconnection of electricity service without notice violates principles of natural justice, necessitating due process in property disputes under Article 226.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.