Union Territoryof Puducherry, Rep. By Special Secretary (Revenue), Puducherry vs N. Rajalakshmi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2175

M. DURAISWAMY, SUNDER MOHAN
Union Territoryof Puducherry, Rep. By Special Secretary (Revenue), Puducherry – Appellant
Versus
N. Rajalakshmi – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Parties:V. Balamurugane, Govt. Pleader, V. Prakash, Senior Counsel, A.R.L. Sundaresan, Senior Counsel, K.G. Raghavan, Senior Counsel, D. Ravichandran, Spl. Govt. Pleader, M. Devaraj, A.L. Gandhimathi, S. Ravi, M/s. Gupta & Ravi, Ananyaa Jagairdar, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to allow the above Writ Appeal as against the order dated 18.03.2021 passed in W.P.No.18681 of 2020 on the file of this Court.

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to allow the above Writ Appeal as against the order dated 18.03.2021 passed in W.P.No.18683 of 2020 on the file of this Court.

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to allow the above Writ Appeal as against the order dated 18.03.2021 passed in W.P.No.4277 of 2016 on the file of this Court.

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to allow the Writ Appeal by setting aside the order passed in W.P.No.18681 of 2020, dismiss the writ petition.

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to allow the Writ Appeal by setting aside the order passed in W.P.No.4722 of 2016 dated 18.03.2021 and allow the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition.

Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to allow the Writ Appeal by setting aside the order passed in W.P.No.18683 of 2020 dated 18.03.2021 and dismiss the writ petition.)

Common Judgment

Sunder Mohan

1. There are six Writ Appeals before us. Challenging the order passed by