SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2252

S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
J. Noordeen – Appellant
Versus
Director General of Police, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:A. Haseena Banu, Advocate. For the Respondents:R.L. Karthika, Government Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the first respondent herein in his proceedings Rc.No.039398/AP IV(1)/2012 dated 07.12.2012 and the order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings C.No.B1/APP.18/2007 dated 27.06.2007 and the order passed by the third respondent herein in his proceedings P.R.No.141/H2/2006 under Rule 17(b) dated 16.03.2007 and quash the same and direct the respondents herein to reinstate the petitioner into service, together with all consequential service and monetary benefits.)

1. The order of punishment dated 16.03.2007 and the appellate order and also the revision order, confirming the order of original punishment, are under challenge in the present writ petition.

2. The writ petitioner joined in the Police Department as Part Time Sweeper on 13.12.1986 and he was made as Full Time Sweeper on 06.09.1991. The service of the writ petitioner was regularised.

3. The departmental disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the writ petitioner and a charge memorandum under Rule 17

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top