Back
T. RAJA, D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
M. E. Sekar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Chennai – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer in W.A.No.1998 of 2012: This Appeal has been filed under Section 15 of Letter of Patent against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.16607 of 2008, dated 27.06.2012.
W.A.No.1999 of 2012: This Appeal has been filed under Section 15 of Letter of Patent against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.24161 of 2008, dated 27.06.2012.
W.A.No.2000 of 2012: This Appeal has been filed under Section 15 of Letter of Patent against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.24162 of 2008, dated 27.06.2012.
W.A.No.2001 of 2012: This Appeal has been filed under Section 15 of Letter of Patent against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.24163 of 2008, dated 27.06.2012.
W.A.No.2002 of 2012: This Appeal has been filed under Section 15 of Letter of Patent against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.16607 of 2008, dated 27.06.2012.
W.A.No.2003 of 2012: This Appeal has been filed under Section 15 of Letter of Patent against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.24167 of 2008, dated 27.06.2012.
W.A.No.2004 of 2012: This Appeal has been filed under Section 15 of Letter of Patent against the orde
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
