Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
K. Palanivel – Appellant
Versus
Government of Tamil Nadu, By its Collector, Collectorate Office, Namakkal – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent through respondents 2 to 6, to release the excess water above normal level in Anaipalayam Lake, through its three sluices, so as to protect the lives and livelihood of villagers of Chandrasekarapuram Panchayat, from the inundation caused by water of Anaipalayam Lake.)
“TAMIL”
A. The Petition:
The President of Chandrasekarapuram Village Panchayat has filed this Writ Petition praying for issuing a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent, through the respondents 2 to 6 to release the excess water above the normal level in the Anaipalayam lake through its three sluices so as to protect the lives and livelihood of the villagers of the Chandrasekarapuram Panchayat from inundation caused by the water of Anaipalayam lake.
B. Facts in Brief:
2. Chandrasekharapuram Village and Anaipalayam are two adjacen
The main legal point established is the significance of upholding conditions in land grants, considering larger public good and sustainable development, and preventing unauthorized conversion of cult....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the duty of the State to hold and manage communal properties, such as water bodies, for the benefit of the community. The judgment also emphasizes ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the public trust doctrine, sustainable development principles, and environmental protection laws in refusing the lease renewal f....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the duty of the state to preserve natural resources, the application of public trust doctrine, intergenerational equity, and sustainable develop....
The court emphasized the Public Trust Doctrine, ruling that wetlands must be protected from alienation for private use, reaffirming their importance for public benefit and environmental sustainabilit....
The main legal point established in this judgment is that the petitioner failed to establish the existence of the Siddapura Lotus Pond on the disputed land and that the grants made to private individ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the State has the power to regulate land development to protect the environment and water sources, and the petitioner's right to property was ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article