SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2421

C. V. KARTHIKEYAN
Janaki Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Amsaveni – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellants:S.T. Bharath Gowtham, T.R. Rajaraman, Advocates. For the Respondents:S. Rajendrakumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC, against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.27 of 1999 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Vellore, confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.137 of 1986 dated 30.11.1998 on the file of the Sub Court, Vellore.)

1. The 6th defendant in O.S. No. 137 of 1986 on the file of the Sub Court, Vellore is the appellant herein.

2. O.S. No. 137 of 1986 had been filed by G.R. Ethiraj, whose legal representatives are the 3rd to 7th respondents in the second appeal, originally against Padmavathi Ammal, who died pending the suit and whose legal representatives had been impleaded as 4th and 5th defendants, Amsaveni and Saroja, the 1st and 2nd respondents in the second appeal, and against T.M. Govindasami Mudaliar, who also died pending the suit, without leaving behind any legal representative and against T.M. Thiruvengada Mudaliar, whose wife was later impleaded as the 6th defendant, the appellant herein, seeking performance of an agreement of sale dated 06.06.1983 with respect to the property described in the ‘A’ Schedule to the plaintiff, namely, 2.56 ¾ acres of land in S. Nos. 714/59, 714/51 and 714./46 in Katpa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top