SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 2521

N. SATHISH KUMAR
Arul Daniel – Appellant
Versus
Suganya – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:P. Chandrasekar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer in Crl.O.P.SR.No.31852 of 2022: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking to call for the records in D.V.C.No.74 of 2022, on the file of the learned Additional Mahila Court, Thiruvallur and quash the same.)

Common Order:

1. These petitions have been filed seeking to quash the complaint filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as ‘D.V.Act’) by invoking the provisions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’)

2. As this Court entertained doubt about invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the complaint filed under Section 12 of the D.V.Act, these petition have been listed under the caption “For Maintainability”.

3. Till recently, in pursuance to the judgment of a learned Single Judge (Hon’ble Mr.Justice N.Anand Venkatesh) of this Court in Dr.P.Pathamnathan Vs. V.Monica reported in (2021) 2 CTC 570, petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C., challenging the proceedings initiated under the D.V.Act has not been entertained.

4. However, in view of the latest judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in P.Ganesan Vs. M.Revathy Prema Rub

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top