N.ANAND VENKATESH
P. Pathmanathan – Appellant
Versus
Tmt. V. Monica – Respondent
ORDER
N. Anand Venkatesh, J.—The issue that falls for consideration in these batch of cases relates to the jurisdiction of the High Court to quash a complaint under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as “D.V. Act” or “the Act”) in exercise of its inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.” or “the Code”).
2. This Court had directed the Registry to put up a number of cases filed between 2017 and 2020, and pending, for quashing applications under Section 12 of the D.V Act. This Court was surprised to learn that over 1000 such cases were pending. The D.V Act endeavors the Magistrate to dispose an application filed under Section 12 (1) within 60 days from the date of its first hearing. However, here is a distressing scenario where the proceedings, in a majority of the cases, have come to a grinding halt without any progress for more than 3 years on account of the pendency of the petitions on the file of this Court.
3. Upon a close reading of the D.V Act, this Court found that the nature of rights that were protected and enforced under the Act were purely civil in nature. However, cons
Hiral P. Harsora v. Kusum Narottamdas Harsora
Kunapareddy v. Kunapareddy Swarna Kumari
V.B D’Monte v. Bandra Borough Municipal Corporation
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mukhtar Singh
S.A.L Narayan Row and Another v. Ishwarlal Bhagwandas
Dargah Committee, Ajmer v. State of Rajasthan
Annie Besant v. Advocate General of Madras
Mt. Mithan v. Municipal Board of Oral and State of U.P.
Ram Kishan Fauji v. State of Haryana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.