G. JAYACHANDRAN
State Represented by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Salem – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378 of Cr.P.C., against acquittal the judgment dated 24.07.2009 in C.C.No.188 of 2005 on the file of Learned Judicial Magistrate Judge, Dharmapuri and prays that this Honourable Court may be pleased to set aside the judgment of Lower Court and convict the respondents/Accused (A1 to A9) as charged.)
1. This Criminal Appeal is filed by the State being aggrieved by the acquittal of the accused who were tried for offences under Sections 465, 466, 468, 471, 420 of I.P.C, Section 65 of Information Technology Act and Section 477-A read with Section 120-B of I.P.C as against the respondents.
2. The case of the prosecution is that, Ramesh Kumar (A1) was working in Computer Section of ELCOT Company at Dharmapuri. He was employed by ELCOT Company to design Driving License and laminate. A2 (Bagyalakshmi) is resident of Dharmapuri appointed by ELCOT Company to coordinate with RTO Office, Dharmapuri. Aravind Kumar (A3) & Senthil Kumar (A4) were expert in Computer Technology and assisting Ramesh Kumar (A1). Govindaraj (A5), Mahendran (A6) and Natarajan (A7) were brokers at RTO Office. Vijjiram (A8) was Assistant in RTO Office, Dharmapuri and S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.