SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 1072

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA, J.
Shri Pawan Kumar Rajak, Son of Shri Vishnu Rajak - Appellant
Versus
Union of India through CBI Bihar - Respondent
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.973 of 2022 with Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 1346 of 2022
Decided On : 18-12-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Gouranga Chatterjee, Adv., Mr. Abhinav Shrivastav, Adv., Mr. Nilanjan Chatterjee, Adv., Mr. Sahil Kumar, Adv., Mohammad Minnatullah, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sourendra Pandey, Spl. PP.

The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the appellants committed fraud or were involved in a criminal conspiracy, leading to their acquittal.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 374(2) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) - Conviction of appellants for fraudulently withdrawing Rs. 82 Lakhs from LIC using forged vouchers and software manipulation - Prosecution failed to prove that appellants were beneficiaries of the fraudulent transactions or that they had created false documents - No original vouchers found, only secondary electronic evidence presented - Acquittal of both appellants ordered. (Paras 71-74)

(B) Criminal Conspiracy - Ingredients of conspiracy not established as prosecution could not prove that appellants acted with a common intention to defraud - Mere procedural lapses insufficient to establish criminal liability. (Paras 68-70)

JUDGMENT :

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

This appeal has been preferred by both appellants/convicts under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) challenging the judgment of conviction dated 21.02.2022 and order of sentence dated 28.02.2022 passed by learned Special Judge, CBI-1, Patna in Special Case No. 01 of 13 (arising out of R.C. No. 9(A) of 2013), whereby the concerned Trial Court has convicted appellant/convict Pawan Kumar Rajak in Cr. APP (SJ) No. 973 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Section 420, 467, 468, 471 of Indian Penal Code (in short “I.P.C.”), Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 (in short the “P.C. Act”) and Section 120B read with Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the P.C. Act and appellant/convict Aftab Alam in Cr. APP (SJ) No. 1346 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Section 420 of the IPC and Section 120B of IPC read with Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and Sections 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the P.C. Act, where they have been sentenced accordingly:-

Sl.No.

Name of appellant

Under Section

Sentence

Fine

In default of payment of fine.

1.

Pawan Kumar Rajak

420 IPC

R.I. for 5 years

10,000/-

6 months

467 IPC

R.I. for 7 years

10,000/-

6 months

468 IPC

R.I. for 5 years

10,000/-

6 months

 

 

471 IPC

R.I. for 7 years

10,000/-

6 months

13(2) read with 13(1)(d) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

R.I. for 3 years

5,000/-

6 months

 

 

120B read with 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC and 13(2)  read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

R.I. for 7 year

5,000/-

6 months

2.

Aftab Alam @ Md. Aftab Alam

420 IPC

R.I. for 5 years

10,000/-

6 months

120B of IPC read with 420, 467, 468, 471

R.I. for 7 years

5,000/-

6 months

 

 

and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

 

 

 

 

All aforesaid sentences are ordered to run concurrently.

2. The case of prosecution in brief is as under :

This case was registered in CBI, ACB, Patna on 30.04.2013 on the basis of written complaint of Senior Divisional Manager, LIC Patna Division, Office-I Patna, (PW8/informant) against Pawan Kumar Rajak, Assistant LIC, Patna Sahib Branch, Patna City, Patna, Aftab Alam, LIC Agent, Patna Sahib Branch, Patna and six other accused persons named in the FIR. It has been alleged that Pawan Kumar Rajak (Assistant LIC) entered into criminal conspiracy with Aftab Alam (LIC Agent) and other accused named in the FIR and in pursuance thereof fraudulently debited Policy Loan account of the said branch for defalcating huge amount by using LIC software application and by using its “ADD Pay option” in policy loan payment module as well as preparing forged vouchers and by this way dishonestly and fraudulently withdrew sum of Rs. 82 Lakhs from the Policy Loan Account of LIC, Patna Sahib Branch. Apart from this Pawan Kumar Rajak (Assistant LIC) also removed all the vouchers of all the fraudulent payments. All the fraudulent vouchers were entered into the module by Pawan Kumar Rajak (Assistant LIC) having SR/Employee No. 339411, accessible only by him.

3. On the basis of aforesaid written complaint, CBI registered a case, as Special Case No. 01 of 2013 (R.C. No. 9(A) of 2013) dated 30.04.2013 for the offence punishable under Section 120B read with 201, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC and also read with Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the P.C. Act, whereafter the investigation, the police submitted charge-sheet no. 21 of 2013 under Section 120B read with 201, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC and Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the P.C. Act.

4. The learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top